|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
Swing TimeTobey Maguire offers up a compellingly human superhero in Spider-Man; Woody Allen thumbs his nose at Hollywood -- what else is new?
BY PETER RAINER
Spider-Man is an odd duck. Despite all the computer-generated effects and highflying superhero theatrics, this roughly $120 million movie is, with few exceptions, remarkable only in its small human touches. Tobey Maguire plays the resonantly nerdy Peter Parker, who is bitten by a genetically mutated spider during a high-school field trip and acquires arachnidlike powers: Newly buff, no longer needing to wear specs, he discovers he can spin webs and scale buildings. Peter's initial awe and distrust for what he has become are compelling and funny; his grand-scale spidery exploits, as they play themselves out in the second half of the movie, feel fairly standard, lacking even the graphic charge of the Marvel Spider-Man comic books.
Stan Lee -- who, with Steve Ditko, first came up with the idea for Spidey in Amazing Fantasy in 1962 -- is credited as an executive producer of the movie, and yet the lore and the look of the film seem derived not so much from the Spider-Man comics as they do from other superhero movies, especially the Superman series. Sam Raimi, who began his career making low-budget horror schlock and graduated to bigger and blander fare, is reputedly a Spider-Man aficionado, but instead of pulling out the stops, he allows a dull conformity to settle in. He's doing here pretty much what Chris Columbus did to Harry Potter; he's protecting the franchise by keeping everything as palatable as possible.
For a while, at least, the mundaneness of the enterprise is somewhat refreshing, compared with, say, the camp grotesqueries of the last few Batman flicks, which just about turned me off to superhero movies forever. Maguire is well-chosen to play a kid with a dual existence: In his earlier movies, such as The Ice Storm, he often appeared rather blankly indrawn, but his reticence here has emotional levels; his character seems genuinely conflicted about using his powers. And Maguire works well with Kirsten Dunst, who plays redheaded Mary Jane Watson, his schoolmate and neighbor in the middle-class Queens neighborhood where he lives with his super-nice aunt May (Rosemary Harris) and uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson). Maguire and Dunst take their sweet time in their scenes together, puzzling out the feelings their characters have about each other. The coy, lovestruck reticence of Peter and Mary Jane, along with their occasional bursts of brashness, will probably mean a lot more to the film's core young-adult audience than all these supersonic spiderwebs. The couple share the film's best moment: After rescuing Mary Jane from a gang of thugs, Peter, as Spider-Man, hangs upside down in the rain in a dark alleyway and allows himself to be kissed by her, his face mask pulled down just enough to facilitate the smooch.
Raimi presents a New York that is only slightly stylized, and the plainness helps to set off the superheroes, not only Spider-Man but his arch enemy, the Green Goblin, played by Willem Dafoe. An armor-plated horror with a gargoyle face who zips around in a metallic glider outfitted with munitions, the Goblin has his own double life as corporate arms manufacturer and mad scientist Norman Osborn. (Dafoe seems scarier, and more goblinlike, when he's not hidden behind a mask.) The big battle between Spider-Man and the Green Goblin takes place at a World Unity Festival in Times Square, and it's a pity we don't get to see more than a snippet of Macy Gray performing "My Nutmeg Phantasy." If the filmmakers had any humor, they would have set Gray against the Goblin -- she's already flying high.
One aspect of Spider-Man may inadvertently move audiences. The film was conceived, of course, pre–September 11, and originally, before the scene was excised, Spidey had an encounter at the World Trade Center. I wish they had kept that material in, but even so, the film seems imprinted with its loss. As a movie location, New York isn't used particularly well in Spider-Man, and the scenes of the superhero whizzing up and around the skyscapes are too blurred and frenetic. And yet, there's a kind of poetic fulfillment for audiences in being able to soar fancy free above the city. For those who have felt confined by fear, it's an immensely satisfying flying dream
Follow Ups:
Finally, some info worthy of spinnin' on the web. ;^)The wife and I already ordered our tickets for an early Friday show (stadium seating of course!), but your post may encourage others to swing into action. BTW, if there are any doubters left, Spidey has earned a "100% fresh tomato" rating thus far from 5 early reviews on the Rotten Tomato site; it looks like the webheads gonna be a "reel" winner! 'Nuff said!
Your friendly neighborhood Audiophilander
I'll likely be seeing "Spiderman" this weekend, but what I'm really looking forward to this summer is "Attack of the Clones." I think George Lucas is going to redeem himself. The buzz on AOTC is very good. Kick ass this time, Yoda will. :-D
The wife & I LOVED the Spidey flick as did the rest of the audience (i.e., there was moderate applause at the end, which is a rarity at most movies and a sure-fire indicator of a hit!).Lucas has a lot to answer for after introducing that obnoxious character Jar-Jar Binks, hiring the sappy kid (i.e., who's name eludes me) over Haley Joe Osment and other stupid aspects of Episode I, but we'll see. So far, my bets are on Spidey and MIB II as big summer hits, but I'm sure that there'll be more.
Your friendly neighborhood Audiophilander
Saw "Spider-Man" and thoroughly enjoyed it. I expected to like Tobey Maguire's performance based on the peculiar charm he brings to every role he plays. He's just so likeable. I'm less of a fan of Kirsten Dunst, but I thought she was a fine match with Maguire in the film. I thought the film could have spent a little more time on Peter Parker's adjustment to his new condition, but, hey, it's a comic book, so I don't really have a problem with them moving things right along. Didn't much care for the music--it was atmospheric and appropriate, but Danny Elfman is just so forgetable. I'm looking forward to the sequel(sequels?). No applause at the theater where I saw it, but it was a Sunday night showing, and the hardcore Spidey fans had probably already seen it. Everyone seemed to have enjoyed it though. I liked it a lot; my wife loved it.I agree with you that Lucas has a lot to atone for. He made some baaaadddd decisions in "The Phantom Menace". I loathed Jar-Jar and didn't like Jake Lloyd as Anakin either. I read somewhere that while Jar-Jar appears in "Attack of the Clones", his role is greatly reduced and that he announces he's learned "diplo-speak" and drops the grating way he talked in "Phantom Menace". Meesa sure hope dat twue. The DVD of "PM" includes a documentary that briefly shows the three final candidates for the Anakin role. The first kid was horrible. The second kid seemed natural and real to me and would have been my choice. Jake Lloyd was the third kid the documentary showed, and I guess he gave Lucas what Lucas was looking for because he overacted as badly in the audition as he did in the film. Glad he won't be in this one.
"So far, my bets are on Spidey and MIB II as big summer hits"Gee, ya think?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: