 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: I don't... I have not seen the Dances... posted by MikeP on November 05, 1999 at 09:50:04:
The sad ending would be the survival of the totally unsympathetic anti-hero...I didn't see that one either.
I understand your statement about the movie being good, and as I said, it might be my loss. But in the meantime I have gained still much, much more, so I don't regret it for a second. I flatly refuse to support the Hollywood with my hard-earned...
Things might have beed different if not for tremendous wealth of trully great works out there - all available for $1 on Friday night and $2.50 during the week.
I like happy endings (smile). If I want unhappy endings all I have to do is think about my love love life (whine, snivel).Different strokes and all that. I freely admit i like trash - as long as its intelligently written. I was watching the x-files the other day and Scully used the word "obfuscation". Now seriously, how often on network tv or even in movies would you hear a word like that used without making some stupid joke out of it?
***Different strokes and all that. I freely admit i like trash - as long as its intelligently written.I don't understand this. If it is intelligently written, then how can it be trash? Remember, art is NOT in subject, it is in the means. When Rabelais writes about excrements and vomiting, he does that so it is art, however low the subject might be. The same subject in Dumb and Dumber is trash because the whole movie is trash and the writer inept.
Most of what we consider art as opposed to trash, has to do with some pretty mundane subject - maid washing dishes in an old Dutch masterpiece, a prostitute, a bloody battle, a cattle and the dead fish... Most of high literature describes simple people and their simple deads, not Gods doing their godly stuff...
So the subject can shock us, but its mere nature doesn't turn artwork into trash, the lousy means do,
***I was watching the x-files the other day and Scully used the word "obfuscation". Now seriously, how often on network tv or even in movies would you hear a word like that used without making some stupid joke out of it?I guess, that entirely depends on the movie. The whole network TV stuff, unfortunately, is just that, trash.
I didn't mean to lose you :-)
I have a friend who likes to read, but he likes "literature", i.e Stenbeck and Faulkner, etc. While I like Steinbeck, I've never been able to relate ot Faulkner and frankly find his "stream of conciousness" style to be poorly written. By trash i meant I like Clancy, Stephen King, Lethal Weapon (I), Clint Eastwood movies (except the spaghetti westerns which are truly excreble), John Wayne, comedies such as "Paint Your wagon" (one of my all timne favorites), etc. IOW stuff that's not "high brow" or "great literature". OTOH, stupidity doesn't impress me.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
