|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
Missed Close Encounters back when, saw it in 70mm "Director's Cut". Missed Apocalypse Now back when, saw it restored in "Director's Cut". Ditto Blade Runner. Ditto even ET! There I was gratified too by Spielberg's digitally removing those nasty guns. I don't think there should be lethal weapons in any movie, or in life. I wholeheartedly support gun image removal.And today we have another must-see-now: Cinema Paradiso. Get a load of this review!
clark
New version is a shining 'Paradiso' found
By Ty Burr, Globe Staff, 6/28/2002The ''Cinema Paradiso'' that opens today is not the ''Cinema Paradiso'' that won the 1989 Oscar for best foreign film. It's better: darker, more idiosyncratic, and certainly more interesting.
Longer, too, by 51 minutes. What's the chief addition? Not much: just an entire third act. Where the original release was an essay in childish delight and adolescent longing, topped off by a muted coda implying that you really can go home again, the reissue is a fully realized epic of the heart, with a message that's as clear as it is chilling: To be an artist is to live without love.
Title aside, this is actually closer to the old version of ''Paradiso'' - the 155-minute cut director Giuseppe Tornatore released to thundering indifference in Italy in 1988. Subsequently cut to two hours, it won a Jury Prize at Cannes, was picked up by Miramax for US release, and proved a hit here - all good reasons for Tornatore to restore the scissored scenes plus 12 additional minutes. Miramax calls this the ''new version,'' but it's not - it's what Tornatore wanted us to see in the first place.
Don't worry, though; the cute kid's still here. In fact, the first hour of ''Paradiso'' plays just as you remember it, with the adorable Toto (Salvatore Cascia) pestering his rural village's grumpy movie projectionist (Philippe Noiret) into giving him the run of the booth. This section's still a lovely depiction of post- World War II Sicily and a paean to the joys of a film-besotted childhood.
New footage starts creeping in only when Toto grows into young Salvatore (Marco Leonardi) and falls hard for upper-class Elena (Agnese Nano). A number of previously unseen scenes transform the hero from a bland hunk into a believably self-absorbed, even selfish, teenager.
By the time we hit the second-hour mark, we're in a whole new movie. (Spoilers ahead, so walk away if you want to stay surprised.) In the original release, we never knew what the middle-aged Salvatore (Jacques Perrin) did for a living; now, we learn, he's a much-admired filmmaker. Previously, we got the sense that he kind of missed his lost love Elena; now we understand that he's obsessed with her. What's more, he tracks her down and forces a reunion. What's more, she's willing. What's more, she spills a long-held secret that completely changes our understanding of kindly old Alfredo the projectionist: Salvatore sees, as do we, that the old man was willing to be a monster to ensure his protege's future calling.
Not one whit of this was in the 1989 version. What was left was a sweet but ultimately harmless slice of art-house nostalgia (and, not coincidentally, a blueprint for later Miramax successes such as ''Chocolat'' and ''Il Postino''). You can argue that Tornatore's uncut vision is just as sentimental in its dourness, and maybe even a little silly - plenty of great artists have both lived and loved - but you can't say that it's not a complete experience. There have always been those who felt that ''Cinema Paradiso'' wasn't worthy of its Oscar. It is now.
Cinema Paradiso: The New Version
Directed by Giuseppe Tornatore
Screenplay by: Peter Fernandez and Giuseppe Tornatore
Starring: Philippe Noiret, Salvatore Cascia, Marco Leonardi, Jacques Perrin
At: Kendall Square Cinema
Running time: 170 minutes
Follow Ups:
I'm one of those who felt that ''Cinema Paradiso'' wasn't worthy of its Oscar. I found it good (3 stars out of 5), but not that great. I dout 50 min added to the film can makes such a difference.Tornatore latest, Malena, is much better, one of the best of last year and one of a few non violent film I enjoy. Starring that big breast Monica Bullici, who also appear in 2 films right now, Asterix and Irreversible.
not as good than it first looked..prove ? look at the other films,he have made...the most terrible one, was" The Boat Piannist"
or how do you call it in English ?
I didn't say Cinema Paradiso wasn't good (3.5 stars out of 5 is more realistic), it wasn't good enough to give it a oscar for the best foreign picture.Malena, there's just a minority who didn't like it. Read the review at www.imdb.com, most of them agree with me that Malena is a excellent movie (4.5 stars).
BTW, there's a film very similar to Cinema Paradiso: Shadow Magic, which is a really good film and won some award for best picture (4 stars):
Beijing, 1902: an enterprising young portrait photographer named Liu Jinglun, keen on new technology, befriends a newly-arrived Englishman who's brought projector, camera, and Lumière-brothers' shorts to open the Shadow Magic theater. Liu's work with Wallace brings him conflict with tradition and his father's authority, complicated by his falling in love with Ling, daughter of Lord Tan, star of Beijing's traditional opera. Liu sees movies as his chance to become wealthy and worthy of Ling. When the Shadow Magic pair are invited to show the films to the Empress Dowager, things look good. But, is disaster in the script? And, can movies preserve tradition even as they bring change?
Summary written by {jhailey@hotmail.com}
Even if they would put 10 stars ( Think of " From Hell " ) it would change anything....this film is inconsistent...but, of course Monica is beautiful....
Shadow magic, sounds good and even if I am afraid of your cinema taste...I will order it.
Cheers.
g
Despite what Patrick describes as "painful", this is quite a good little film about a person born on a liner in 1900. (He is found abandoned under a dining table by one of the stokers who was scavenging for dropped valuables/stogies).The child is raised on board, and has a unique talent for the piano. He becomes the pianist for the ship's band, and his amazing ability creates a strange legend about the world's greatest pianist who has never set foot on land.
The piano duel with Jelly Roll Morton is a highlight.
It is an Italian production, but the script is entirely in English.
Tim Roth is very good as the lead, and worth seeing.
this film an absolute failure ?
Considering that you and me are the only ones who have seen it.As for "cross- eyed", did you mean Max the trumpet player ? I think he has a lazy eye.
I liked the soundtrack too- Morricone as usual.
He was looking for an expression.. lazy eye, that´s it ! Thank you !
I really think his films are all fakes... they duplicated emotions that in reality he do not feels...Because of the good play of actors and others benefic factors , he can diverted from his real failure.
Morricone has long lost his touch...
Too bad, we are the only one, here, to discuss the fil..but as we are of absolutely different point of view, it can be fun, too !
Yes,that must be it...this actor telling this story with his yes crossing..two hours long the most " penible " thing I ever had to endure in a movie..
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: