 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: The real test is..... posted by Chris Garrett on November 06, 2002 at 10:23:56:
I read Spiderman comics as a kid, and I know the background very well. That's not what my rant is about. My point is that they didn't even try to take the idea of Spiderman to another level---which is what a good movie is supposed to do.The storylines in the early Superman and Batman movies were true to the original vision, yet they took some chances outside the basic story everybody knew.
Spiderman was structured with an assembly line script---it moves along like it was put together by a kiddie-tested focus group. I see nothing wrong in disliking that kind of movie, even one with origins in a comic book.
Follow Ups:
I see it as a rudementary introduction for what is sure to become a franchise marque.As I said, I'm not up on Spiderman, but I thought the first third of the movie did an interesting job of painting a picture of Peter Parker as a high schooler. I got a good sense of who he was and what his family life was like. We saw Mary Jane develop and as I understand it, she plays a major role in Spidey's life up until a point. Granted, only 35-45 minutes worth, but it rendered a valid picture for me.
I thought that there was good interplay in the middle with Harry (?), Peter, MJ and Auntie, along with Dr. Osbourne and the newpaper editor was funny. This lead up to a battle that didn't surprise anyone, but it's a good vs. evil thing and it is what it is. At the end, he can't come to grips with his feelings and letting them be known to MJ. Obviously, there will be Spidey II coming the year after next, so the story moves on.
Take care, Chris
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
