|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: I prefered Matrix to either film. posted by Mart on June 20, 1999 at 02:18:31:
I agree with you completely about Matrix. IMHO, Matrix is the first cyber-movie that's firing on all cylinders. Where "Star Woes - Abysmal I" relied on rather ho-hum special effects to carry a weak story with cardboard and stereotypical characters, Matrix had spectacular visuals with interesting, complex characters in a chilling, well told story worthy of repeat visits. Keanu finally hit his stride with this one; let's hope he can keep it up!As for Brendon Fraser, my wife and I thought he pulled off the swashbuckler role amazingly well. We were both pleasantly surprised [Mummified? :-)] and now consider him every bit the action hero that Harrison what's-his-name was in those Indiana something-or-other flicks! We've actually seen The Mummy on four occasions (note: as opposed to ST-EI, which only saw our cash on one occasion) and have yet to tire of it! Those who assume that it's simply a hip remake of the old Universal horror film from the 30's are in for a pleasant shock.
BTW, if you want to see just how wide a range of acting chops Brendon Fraser has, check out Gods and Monsters; my jaw went slack --- this dude can ACT!
AuPh
PS: Eat your heart out George Lucas, Titanic still rules!
Titanic st... sunk, get over it! Lets not keep it st.. sinking up the screen.PS: it's StarWars-E1 not StarTrek.
I guess you've set sail with the Titanic backlash; no problem, it happens with all hugely successful films.BTW, sorry 'bout the "T vs W" confusion; at least I got the "Star" part right! ;-)
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: