|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
Mates,I saw "Quest for Fire" last evening for second time since it was a new film (1981) and I was reminded how compelling this movie is.
If you don't know this one, it is the story of a group of people about 80,000 years ago living in a more or less swamp situation whose fire goes out. As they do not know the method of making fire, must go off in search of a ready-made flame to bring back. It is then the story of the life-threatnening difficulties in retrieving a flame!
Powerful moments:
The group realizes that the flame is out and this is possibly the difference between life and death.
Ron Perlman sees the gourd used as a container for the first time, it was as striking as someone seeing some kind of advanced aliens.
The 'discovery' of laughter- the hilarious rocks dropped on the head routine turns out to be 80,000 years old!- andThe missionary position as the 'new'way individual bonds are formed and strengthened.
When Ron Perlman sees his first grass hut and thinks it is a giant sleeping animal, throwing a spear at it. the idea of a man-made shelter ocurrs because of the advanced tribe's proximity to grass.
RP bows in front of a wolly mammoth with an offering of grass and the mammoths stampeded the advancing, threatening group- a kind of strange instant alliance between a person and animals.
One striking image is that of the man who, after the incredible odyssey of the group finding fire, douses it in the river in his excitement. This is of course, exokes the original fundamental fear of the loss of fire. One striking aspect is that the man is bald- I just never think of early men being bald- it just struck me. I notice that character was not seen in the group later!
When the girl from the advanced tribe makes fire and the look of enlightenment on RPs face was one of transformation. After seing this movie the first time, I went out and tried making fire in the same way- without success. No Scout badge for me!
Given that there is no discernible dialog other than the Anthony Burgess created ones, the depiction of these complex themes of early human struggling to improve their situation is fabulous. Overall, the themes of social and technical advancements in relation to environment tells a strong story of adaptation and cooperation.
The detailed,physicality of the acting is made very natural and the interaction between the groups at various stages of progress is subtely wonderful. This strikes me as one of the most intelligent movies I've seen in a long while- I couldn't look away.
Anyone else like - or hate- this one?
Cheers,
Follow Ups:
I liked it too. I cannot remember if I saw it once or twice but I often remember it and I often feel tempted to watch it again when I see the cover at the videothek.
The whole movie was hilarious and the scene I loved most was the one where they have to stay the night on a tree because of the lion. They were trying so hard but then they were so lovingly stupid. The other thing I liked about it was that there was no real speech(practically a silent movie) but everything was understandable.
I liked the other 2 movies of Annand too by the way. Different people different taste...
Yeah, I remember this one from the movies - have seen it later on TV, too. I liked it - & Rae Dawn Chong is great, even mudcovered! "Name Of The Rose" was OK, but not as good as this one.
I saw it twice long time ago..Like every Annaud film it is a failure,
an almost " could have been ".For this one I can not remember any details, too long ago.....
patrick,Interesting comment, as I think Annaud's "The Name of the Rose" and later "Seven Years in Tibet" were atmospheric but missed opportunities, but "Quest for Fire" does evoke use that prehistoric atmosphere in a way that has never been done before or since and not in a forced or contrived way.
Not even "1,000,000 Years B.C." with Raquel Welch, "Cave Girl," or the Ape bone throwing scenes in "2001" measures up!
This must have required astounding time to research and prepare.
And very memorable visually. When watching again, many scenes- being treed by lions, the quicksand, and others- were so familiar 20 years later.
Cheers,
Yes, that is true...But that doesn´t either make an good film...
Look at " The Name..." it could have became such a good film !
The idea of a Sherlock in middle age was fascinating...and Sean could had have the role of his life time with James...But no ! Annaud make a film for the time frame of three years...Stupid !
I will definitely go rent it. I have seen it twice since it came our and really liked the "discoveries" out heroic team encountered while on their quest. Rae Dawn Chong was outstanding--covered in mud! It is a worthwile see.
I was 13 when I saw this movie, and boy did it give me a sensuality kick start, in a genuine and classy way of course.I would like to see it again too, and see if it holds up.
mp
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: