|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
w
Follow Ups:
One of the stupidest movies I've seen in years. If you're gullible enough to think that computer viruses can be spread through a wall-socket, then you might think it's OK....but this is just one example of how farfetched this eye-rolling, head-shaking farce is.
Brotherhood of the Woolf & Panic Room, positive critics in your online place are a shame ! One of the best place for every thing that included Hi-fi & video, with such lamentable reviews.
That were the films " to leave your brain at the door ".
When I think of the last " TPV " with good critics for Panic Room, too...I can only shake my head !
Bah, I knew it.
I was watching The Sum of All Fears on DVD with audio commentary by its director and the author of the book it was based on, and most of it was Tom Clancy complaining about how the director screwed up his story and added unrealistic elements to the plot (Clancy is a pretty rude guy, hehe).
What happens is, these moron Hollywood writers and directors think they're smarter than sh*t, and so their ideas must be adaptable to the real world.
s
Yesterday. Pacino wasn't too bad until the end. Ferrell is coming along nicely as a leading man, and I hope he's soon to replace Cruise (Mr. Wooden himself). The story had the requisite twists, all in their correct places. Not a bad way to spend a few hours. I give it a, say, 3 out of 5. Nothing all that bad about it, but nothing all that great either.I am looking forward to seeing Ferrell as Bullseye in DareDevil, though Affleck would probably be my absolute last choice as DD. DD is one of my all time favorite comic book heroes.
I'd give it 3 outta 5, also. Pacino is always Pacino. As for the end, I think the script went soft on him.What is it with Ferrell? Where did he come from? I've noticed him in a lot of films lately and can't figure out why?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: