 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: about Gattaca, can you guys settle an old argument? posted by late on January 29, 2000 at 17:42:52:
The DNA analysis should've indicate which person was predisposed to commit murder, but the film's theme was to counter that deterministic view with the tag line: "There is no gene for the human spirit". Well there very well may be gene(s) for the human spirit. The problem is that the assays are a bitch. And you can't prove a negative (there I go quoting mtrycrafts again).Personally, I think the brother/detective could have done it to help his brother.
using the old means, motive, opportunity-
a) the kid was in the office that day, i don't remember the brother being there, but i may be incorrect
b) motive ( going in reverse order, bass ackwards is a habit of mine )
It is theoretically possible, but, as one real life detective said, 'can you name somebody who did that'. Sounds implausible to me.
c) means - this is actually quite interesting, bashing a guys head in the office is not a carefully premeditated crime, not in the office. It sounds like an explosion of rage; which points the finger at you know who
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]