|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
An ephiphany really...I woke up in the middle of the night and realized that, that must be one of the most BRILLIANT movies ever made. Our whole puritanical society fell head over heals in love with a prostitute, and rationalized why a dirty street hooker should get to fall in love with prince charming. Remember Cinderella, she was not a sleezy slut...she was a martyr, clearly deserving of a fairy tale life. Even the people who hated the movie, did not hate it because Julia was a hooker, they probably just hated Julia (and Gere)She slept with men for money, and was darling enough to floss her teeth, come on she wasn't that dirty..she even bathed for us to prove it. MY grandparents raved about that movie for god's sake, and they go to church at least three times a week!
Maybe the filmakers got drunk and stoned, and had a bet, kind of like in the movie Trading Places...let's see if we can get the conservative americans to see a movie about a whore.
Brilliant!
mp
Follow Ups:
I saw “Pretty Woman” years ago and loathed it. But one scene almost redeemed the film. The character played by Ms. Roberts attends her first opera and, for the first time I recall, a Hollywood movie featured a character deeply moved by richer, more complex art forms than those accompanied by popcorn. Now if I could only see once before I die a character genuinely challenged, delighted and intrigued by a work of contemporary art…
Julia Roberts notwithstanding, "Pretty Woman" is a crappy piece of tripe with an unpleasant story. Good actors and the charm of Ms. Roberts do not change make it a good movie!My wife loves it. I think she fell for the so-called romantic story.
Wanna see a M U C H better movie with a somewhat similar theme? Watch "Breakfast At Tiffanys."
Cinderella with a hooker. No, I don't like it either.
***Wanna see a M U C H better movie with a somewhat similar theme? Watch "Breakfast At Tiffanys."LOL! It is kind of hard to put them side-by-side, or even consider together! Breakfast is one of high points in world cinema. You mean Holly was a.....? No way, man! I'v seen hookers, and she ain't it!
like in "Pretty Woman."The word was "somewhat." The movies have similar themes even if the specifics are different.
It bothers me that "Pretty Woman" is seen as a high point of 90s cinema. I've always been bothered by the notion that a woman is somehow "property" and think the Gere character shallow and loathsome.
I do wish that those who so admire "Pretty Woman" would watch "Breakfast At Tiffanys."
And, yes, "BAT" is one of the great films of the 60s. And isn't Audrey Hepburn just a sheer delight? She was in all her films but really shines in the roll of Holly. The story is basically fluff but, man, what they did with it!
I do like Julia Roberts very much. She has a great presence and is a highly skilled and apealling actress. She ain't no Audrey Hepburn - but who is?
Audrey was an original. Right up there in the pantheon of leading actresses. There was Kate Hepburn, Ginger Rogers, Bette Davis, Ingrid Bergman, Maria Falconetti (silents), Audrey Hepburn, Myrna Loy, and sometimes Irene Dunne and Joan Crawford. Then there was all the rest. (I left out modern actresses, of which only a very few belong in the same company as the aforementioned talents.)
Audrey was always delightful. There will never be another who can touch her. She was a great one.
on this board who think that "Pretty Woman" is a "high point in 90's cinema". And suffice it to say that I agree 100% with your assessment of past and present actresses (You might get a fight from Victor regarding Ingrid, though..hehe).
"Would you be surprised to know that this rough, tough individual was wearing pink satin undies under his rough exteriour clothing? He is."
instead of Cinderella being innocent and pure, she was a dirty street walker. All those fairy tales have women being kept by men, which was appropriate to the times.mp
In the overal scope of things it was not the worst piece of trash to hit the screen, no man. Would I go and pay to watch that trash? No man.Are there any redeaming values in that piece of trash? No man.
Was it guarantee to make good buck for the producers? Yes Sir.
And the last.... was it about a whore? No man.
.
Big difference. Yeah, right.
hede, hede, hede, he...
whoa, whoa, whoa, whoaI apologize...
mp
Roberts was at her peak for appeal, I think. Looked her best, acted her cutest (not Bullock cute, ugh).
or for youngest who want to reach that statue in a very few years...A kind of romantic stupor & stupidity, adding a zest of false candor, going after our bucks...in a very pretending way...
I saw it only twice.....
nt
For not willing to permit teasing myself ?
Hehe..
I hated it (and still do) because:1) It presents a horrible role model of a successful career woman sleeping her way to the top.
2) Her best friend's drug problem is downplayed.
3) The title ruins a perfectly good, voyeuristic Roy Orbison song.
4) Julia Roberts has a mouth like a horse (Victor is right).
5) As Mrs. Piggy points out, Garry Marshall is a marketing genius.
On a positive note, Hector Elizondo is his usual brilliant self. But he was much fucking better in "Young Doctors In Love."
what a great movie, as I recall...it's been years! I'll have to look it up :o)mp
...has been etched in my politically-incorrect memory for all time.
Can have some practical purpose ! In this I can really not understand Victor...
Isn't that what you meant, Dirty Patrick?
Nothing as a chance to pass unnoticed through your scrutinizing eyes...Not the smallest dirty thought....Very dear Victor...You are the real BIG BROTHER....
Me? I wash my watermellons.
You ! I think you are terribly under the control of your dear wife....
Poor boy, poor Victor...I, I am free like a bird..lalala....
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: