Films/DVD Asylum

Have you been following what you started?? nt

206.243.39.17

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ] [ FAQ ]

clarkjohnsen

(R)

In Reply to: The Passion posted by Beethoven on July 22, 2003 at 14:07:31:

a

Follow Ups:

It's too late to whine now. - Audiophilander 09:33:05 07/25/03 (8)
You misbehaved and got virtually spanked! Don't blame Beethoven because you apparently aren't willing to face the music! ;^)
BTW, I plead the 5th! :o)
AuPh
- Can't we all just get along?!? - Beethoven 06:02:28 07/26/03 (7)
  Honestly, I wasn't expecting this kind of a response, but a healthy civil debate is always important. If folks are already this impassioned (sorry, just had to say it), just imagine what would happen after the movie comes out.
  - I like civil debate, but I don't especially care for religious profiling as conducted by Mel's "Passion Police!" - Audiophilander 23:58:42 07/26/03 (0)
    ;^)
  - "Imagine what would happen after the movie comes out. " - clarkjohnsen 06:55:13 07/26/03 (5)
    Probably nothing. The detractors here have never seen it, besides being (for the most part) avowedly anti-Christian. Which, it must be noted, it's quite all right to be.
    clark
    - You keep grousing about "detractors" never having seen this flick, but as it's key defender have YOU seen it??? - Audiophilander 23:39:15 07/26/03 (4)
      BTW, you tossed off the remark that "...it must be noted, it's quite alright to be (Christian)", but WHY did you feel that must it be noted? No one has said that it is NOT alright to be Christian! OTOH, you've gone out of your way to denounce anyone (i.e., the Liberal "elite" as you call them, especially) who question the film's content or feel that the film's producers may have selectively limited the audience in a manner that some might find bigoted. In other words, this wasn't a typical pre-release screening of a work-print solely to assess public opinion, but rather, it appears to be a form of intense lobbying with a clearly discriminatory subtext.
      AuPh
      - You're a walking, talking cliche -- plus, wrong: see below. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:53 07/30/03 (1)
        
        In Reply to: You keep grousing about "detractors" never having seen this flick, but as it's key defender have YOU seen it??? posted by Audiophilander on July 26, 2003 at 23:39:15:
        
        s
        
        All I'm asking is "have you seen the film?" - Audiophilander 10:21:16 07/30/03 (0)
        
        In Reply to: You're a walking, talking cliche -- plus, wrong: see below. nt posted by clarkjohnsen on July 30, 2003 at 09:34:53:
        
        A simple yes or no will suffice.
        AuPh
      - I think you need to reread Clark's post...... - Chris Garrett 17:31:46 07/29/03 (1)
        
        In Reply to: You keep grousing about "detractors" never having seen this flick, but as it's key defender have YOU seen it??? posted by Audiophilander on July 26, 2003 at 23:39:15:
        
        I think that he stated that, in his opinion, it's alright to be "anti-Christian."
        Chris
        
        I did read Clark's post before responding; I just failed to place the word (anti-) in parenthesis. - Audiophilander 09:59:44 07/30/03 (0)
        
        In Reply to: I think you need to reread Clark's post...... posted by Chris Garrett on July 29, 2003 at 17:31:46:
        
        My bad! :o(
        That omission doesn't alter the context of my response significantly if you re-read it. Thanks for catching my error though!
        AuPh

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Schiit Audio

You can not post to an archived thread.