|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: You impersonating AuPh? posted by Victor Khomenko on September 02, 2003 at 07:25:51:
make the same claim, and be just as wrong, about theatre, novels. It takes a Flaubert to make a Madame Bovary, after all.
To be great art, a film must do both, of course. But I didn't say this was a great effort, merely that it had artistic merit. Interesting ideas, characters, a bit of mystery and a bit of thought thrown in. Charlotte Rampling, I thought, did a very good job with a difficult role.
Now, the Fassbinder re-make...terrible. Good soft porn, but not much else to recommend. The protagonist was a pig with no redeeming merit, always a death shot.
Follow Ups:
I could simply state that one can - and many have - create a masterpiece with no identifiable subject matter, but the most interesting plot done with no imagination produces nothing but garbage.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: