 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Little references and influence posted by Bambi B on September 26, 2003 at 17:30:27:
Funny how that pre assassination flic informs the JFK, RFK, and, somewhat, the MLK assassinations. Frankenheimer who directed Manchurian also directed "Winter Kills".According to the post which I read about Condon's book , the characters who have been theorized to have been in on the Kennedy assassination were signalled in the book, but not their real names, of course. According to this view, right wing, John Birch types who wanted a war with the USSR at all costs, were the perps.
Follow Ups:
edta,Interesting, I had never heard that theory. A paranoid's dream come true that there are secret signals in the media.
And The Manchurian Candidate" has it's connection to JFK; I seem to remember that "Manchurian Candidate" was withheld from release so as not upset the public further after 11/22. I wonder if that would happen today when movie deals are signed with the parents when the baby is still down the well?
As for the event, there must be as many theories as there are people. What do you think happened?
Cheers,
Bambi B
And a later coverup. Now what group is big enough to pull that off?
For years I subscribed to Probe magazine for the facts about the case not the spin. Did you ever read the Warren Report or parts of it? The headlines and conclusions are diametrically opposed to the facts in the text.With more government records being unsealed more facts are entering the public domain. There is a book out useful to anyone seeking the facts in this matter.
More in the new book by Probe analysts.
edta,Thanks for the links- new information and ideas on the subject are alway interesting- and it's interesting on it's own that it's pursued so assiduously still.
11/22/63: I think you're correct concerning a "professional hit". My thought was that 11/22/63 was the work of a very small cell of a few closely-knit, single-minded people and this is how it was kept under wraps so easily. I can not believe in a giant conspiracy of the CIA, FBI, highly strung Cubans, Naval Intelligence, LBJ, McNamara, the MOB, and etc- there would be too many people, too many conflicting motives, and someone would by now have a crisis of conscience, need the money from the definitive book, or be an indiscreet drunk. Oswald, such a mysterious figure, perhaps pushed his way into this group or was recruited as the goat, then silenced by Ruby when he had panicked, shot Tippett, and was caught and could become a bean spiller. And the Warren Commission was probably mostly well intentioned, but just out of their depth to make the investigation and had to say something comfortably final to calm the public.
All armchair analysis (ever notice that you can't spell "analysis" without the word "anal"?) open to suggestions and revision.
Never fails to fascinate. When I see Saint Peter, I will first thank him, and then immediately ask..
Cheers,
Bambi B
PS: Oh, I need to say the word "film" in this post or get thrown into the maelstrom "Outside".
Another conspiracy flic, but the wrong one.Winter Kills was by a relative newcomer, right? Anyone on here opine on it?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
