|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Charles Chaplin posted by djprobed on September 30, 2003 at 09:33:04:
It was a propagada film. The only point we could agree on ( I refuse to call it a critic ..) is the last ( jewish-lament-communistic-naive-but so humanistic-utopian ) monolog.
All the rest is so funny and so...touch by genius as one human can be-through hard work.
How can you NOT fell on your knees at the scene were Adolph play with the world? How can you not be philosopically touched by the twin irony of the double faced?
This film was so much ahead of his time.
If you knew history you would cry. On you.
Follow Ups:
you both are mistaking political satire for propaganda.
The very fact that it is difficult to agree on what genre this film really is, I would say, supports my position.In my opinioin there is nothing satirical about the final monologue--it is pure propaganda.
I agree that the rest of the political content would probably be more appropriately classified as satire. But again, sometimes the satire is hard-hitting (the way the stormtroopers are portrayed as they bully people in the streets), sometimes it is like a newspaper cartoon brought to life (the image of the Hitler character playing with the globe, which I admit is a great image on its own), and sometimes the humour has nothing to do with the political message (the slapstick bits such as the barber chair).
And I don't need a history lesson, thank you very much. Reflecting on the Holocaust can indeed bring me to tears, even if this film doesn't. I should also mention that I don't object to the mixing of tragedy and comedy as a rule, if these elements are blended with balance and good timing; I just don't feel this film succeeds aesthetically in this respect.
djprobed
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: