Films/DVD Asylum

Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!!

217.228.143.17

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

patrickU

(A)

In Reply to: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! posted by gware on October 01, 2003 at 21:05:02:

The name of the Rose..a good film ? One of the worst ever...You must have been:
1) Madly in love with a beautifule japanese creature..
2) Totally drunk
3) both
Sir Sean has chic to choose only very bad films to play in it. Presence is good when you are 25, and with over 60 he still has ...but he is laking of good judgement...and the good directors are not a plenty..what is left are terribly boring films...
This man is just good enough to play " decoration ".

Follow Ups:

Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - Dmitry 11:26:07 10/02/03 (11)
Name of the Rose is a good film. You're probably mistaking it for something else.
- Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - patrickU 13:54:05 10/02/03 (10)
  if that is a good film then..I do not know what is a bad film.
  PS: It was made ( partly near the place were I live )
  PS2: If it is agood film in your opinion you caolud have the energy & the elegance to elaborate...
  PS3: Not completely gaga....
  - Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - Dmitry 14:36:09 10/02/03 (9)
    are you talking about the film based on Eco's book?
    - Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! - patrickU 00:45:32 10/03/03 (8)
      The only Film Whose name is bearing the title " The Name..bla..bla.." is One of Eco�s long pending orgasm....
      And now tell me, with definition please, why this film of yours, bears such a great value in your ...mind.
      - Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - orejones 01:34:50 10/04/03 (7)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Thats SIR Sean Connery BTW!! posted by patrickU on October 03, 2003 at 00:45:32:
        
        ...and then, when shaving every morning, and remembering their faces, that can make your day start in a not-so-negative way?
        Just a long shot. And the film, which wasn�t very good, wasn�t so bad either...
        Regards
        BF
        
        Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - patrickU 05:45:23 10/04/03 (6)
        
        In Reply to: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... posted by orejones on October 04, 2003 at 01:34:50:
        
        It will not cahange my point..of view..( Me and the mirror..)
        The film was very bad..It was an French / Italo production trying to mimic the big US ...without the professionalism..and the know how.
        it was like this big ugly American figure ( Hulk ? )
        
        Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - Dmitry 06:05:30 10/04/03 (5)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... posted by patrickU on October 04, 2003 at 05:45:23:
        
        did you read the fucking book? jeez, you're dense sometimes...
        
        Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - patrickU 06:10:31 10/04/03 (4)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... posted by Dmitry on October 04, 2003 at 06:05:30:
        
        Dense..Thank you...I will take this word in the Latin sense.
        What has the book to do with the film ?
        Nothing.
        At least in my imagination world.
        I know critics did found back then that the film did well covered the book.
        I did not.
        Did you read it ?
        
        Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - Dmitry 07:37:41 10/04/03 (3)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... posted by patrickU on October 04, 2003 at 06:10:31:
        
        --Dense..Thank you...I will take this word in the Latin sense.
        I didn't know you could Scisne Latine? If you do -
        Aliquisne domum est?
        --What has the book to do with the film ? Nothing.
        Nothing in a physical or philosophical sense?
        Except the film was based on the book. You know. Almost nothing.
        --Did you read it ?
        Yes. Want to talk about semiotics?
        
        Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - patrickU 08:24:13 10/04/03 (2)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... posted by Dmitry on October 04, 2003 at 07:37:41:
        
        No, I am a lone some cow boy...without a home..Like a rolling stone.
        I know so many films based on a given book...ha..ha !
        Rimbaud could, I can too...
        
        Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... - Dmitry 13:50:52 10/04/03 (1)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... posted by patrickU on October 04, 2003 at 08:24:13:
        
        Ara vos prec per aquella valor que vos guida al som de l'escalina, sovegna vos a temps de ma dolor. Poi s'ascose nel foco che gli affina.
        And that's the end of the story.
        
        Esperanto, maybe? (nt) - orejones 02:26:54 10/07/03 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Maybe because it has the biggest amount of the ugliest men ever seen on screen... posted by Dmitry on October 04, 2003 at 13:50:52:

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

VH Audio

You can not post to an archived thread.