|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: "Somehow I find the notion that one must see every film just to know it is bad indefensible." Baloney! posted by Audiophilander on December 22, 2003 at 07:24:02:
I didn't see clark say it was a bad film, so you hysterically liead about that.Then I didn't say that either - there goes your another lie. I said that based on the privious films I have no inclination of wasting my time.
Sounds like you are simply unable to think straight when someone disagrees with your choices... but that has been your traditon all along.
But now you are down to pure lies... this is intellectually insulting.
Follow Ups:
ROTFL! That's more than meager pretentiousness, that's pure unadulterated chutzpah! ;^D> > > "I didn't see Clark say it was a bad film..." < < <
No, Clark weaseled out of that by using other critic's opinions, those in the vast minority, in order to reflect his own preconceived notions. Pretty silly approach to criticizing a movie if you ask me, but that's Clark for you!
> > > "Then I didn't say that either..." < < <
But you did, Victor. The fact that you tried to weasel out of it by employing a very weak caveat (i.e., having no inclination of wasting your time based on the other two films, which BTW, is rather disingenuous since you haven't seen either of the previous films except in bits and pieces) doesn't alter the fact that you're placing a value judgment on the film without having seen it.
Heck, I even tried to sit through the Solaris (Russian), which is the most boring film this side of Robert Altman's Pret-a-Porter, before passing judgment.
> > > "But now you are down to pure lies... this is intellectually insulting." < < <
If there's any "intellectual insulting" going on around here, most folks now KNOW from whence it originates; let me give you a hint... it aint comin' from your's truly! ;^)
AuPh
!
;^)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: