|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
One really has to remember that he was one of the very best among the best. Of course they are some times silents, and in freaky black and white, and they they donīt have bloody digitalsceneries and anti climax, worse they are in mono, ant to top that! They belong to daddy.
But boy, what a power, HE could let the faces speaks on screen without a word in the magnitude of Murnau & Eisenstein & Bergman & Hitch & Orson & Fellini and the rest...And that IS the greatest achievement possible in films! ...Remember the City Lights, when the girl recognise him after her eyes operation?
Or him playing with the whole world in " Le Grand Dictateur " ..Eating his shoe...in the Gold rush....the quasi ballet scene in " Modern Times " and his genial " ring scene " and the " Kid "..and.....
The only mistakes he ever made was to be rich.....To be free and telling like he thought it may have been.
He has all my respects for ever.
Follow Ups:
agreed, some of the best moments in film are his
Chaplin was unfathomably popular, there was even a religious group in Vietnam that worshipped him as an icon!
He did a great deal to promote film as a popular medium and formed United Artists which gave actors a voice against the power of the studios
I wouldnt mind betting that with his image of the tramp with bowler hat and cane, baggy trousers and moustache, Chaplin created the single most universally recognised persona of the 20th Century
Graham
I enjoy both Keaton and Chaplin (also LLoyd) but Keaton's "Sherlock, Jr." and "The General" are both on my own list of the 10 greatest films ever made.
Keaton was of course more than great, and one actor always left behind and who was good too: Stan Laurel by the way!
He was a quadruple threat: actor, director, producer, and supreme stunt man.
There are brilliant moments in many of their films as well, ever bit as beautiful and touching.> > > "HE could let the faces speaks upon the screen without a word..." < < <
Ummm, like yeah; his best films were made before the advent of sound with the exception of City Lights and Modern Times (i.e., The Circus being released just as sound was taking hold)! By hat time he felt that sound would destroy the charm and pathos of his Little Tramp character.
Seriously, I get your point, but that could be said of many other fine actors and comedians as well. Furthermore, when Chaplin finally made the move to sound he did so rather awkwardly (i.e., in The Great Dictator) with less emphasis on the pathos and more on the slapstick and his later films are often pretentious and ponderous to the point of distraction.
FTR, in spite of how my criticism of Chaplin's work probably sounds, I really do like most of his films, but I must emphasize that he isn't my favorite silent era artist/comedian. IMHO, Harold Lloyd's films hold up better as do most of Keaton's and they had greater output; French comedian Max Linder was more inspired; comediannes like Marion Davies were often funnier and Mary Pickford could equal Chaplin's pathos and charm.
These are just my opinions of course; YMMV.
Well he f**** Marion Davies, I believe you can not do all together...
But for me he is the best. No one could emotionally mach him. No brain but all heart, so to say.
And what a man.
Very happy New Year!
;^)
At least I suppose...
"Wars, conflict, it's all business. One murder makes a villain; millions a hero. Numbers sanctify." (Mr. Verdoux said, while waiting to be executed...)Did you like it?
Regards
I saw it too long ago, but I remember* not like it very much as it spoke more to the brain as to the " heart " and that was atypical for CC. The same applies for " A King in NJ "
But of course who had to be seen.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: