 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Of COURSE the nose looked fake! posted by Troy on February 18, 2004 at 07:31:25:
Well, Troy, I thought it was clear the nose comment was a joke... sigh...But to answer your question, I wasn't bored at all with the Depardieu version - it is a great film from many perspectives.
And it was done in good taste. If I recall correctly, the nose in that film was not overdone, like in the Hollywood version. Call it your usual French subtlety and style. I haven't seen the Reffer version - but will see it soon.
Follow Ups:
I may think that the best version is the..Theater version. Edmond Rostand book never shines more than on a stage.
By the way it is ROXANE.
And did you knew that he was a real man who lived in the XVII?
***And did you knew that he was a real man who lived in the XVII?Yes, of course. A soldier, a humanist and a satire writer. Trips to the Moon and Sun, among the other works.
One thing for sure - his nose (although large) was NOT like Martin's.
Do you know of a good portrait of his?
No, do you have one ?
No. One article mentioned the Le Doyen's portrait of his, but I have been unable to find it. You are closer to it - see if you can find it.
Here it goes.....ttp://savithe.free.fr/acc.html
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
