|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Don't be loyal to any oen country, beloyal to movie art posted by Victor Khomenko on March 18, 2004 at 04:39:04:
one I don't know where you get the idea that I'm an American?Two, I have too much of a life to watch 12 movies a week.
Three, Roger Ebert, thank you very much, I'll take over some pretentious nobody on a film forum. (Of Course Roger also liked 81/2 so he gets duped by pretentious films sometimes too - then maybe it takes one to know one).
Four, perhaps your age is a reason why new films you dislike -- not that THEY are bad - but because YOU are out of touch with what is relevant to younger people.
That is the same stupid attitude that older people tend to have with young people's music. You don't "get it" so therefore it is the music or the art or the film that's lousy -- or your out of date term ... kaka.
You remember a film when growing up you hold dear. Someone today sees a film - I'l use Casablanca as an example. That film is revered by every critical oganization going and most of the boomers. And younger sheep going through film school are taught to believe their 60 year old instructor's beliefs. If anyone was being truly hoonest that rented that fiolm yeasterday for the first time would have to laugh at its totally stilted performances and ridiculous dialogue. It's a product of its period it deserves merit historically and possibly thematically but good? By today's standard it's a total joke.
Maelstrom was a fine film - There are probably 200 Hollywoiod films since 1980 that are superior films. Maelstrom is artsy - but unlike you I actually like storytelling in movies not JUST camara work and anal rejects like Fellini whining for 2 hours to the audience that he's no longer a capable director. Other than proving it.
We have a gold mine of a video store that carries all this stuff. I have a hit list of about 50 "artsy" films not from North Aemrica that I intend to wade my way through. You may be correct and maybe it's dumb luck that I keep renting supposed classics that are rubbish after rubbish after totally outdated rubbish. The Third Man was quite good if they completely removed the score which is one of the worst in the history of film. Still manages to be great.
Follow Ups:
Your age separation is naive at best. While there is a gap, you are taking it to ridiculous extreme. To deny that a person is actually supposed to know better as he grows up is indefensible silliness.Casablanca? I wrote something close to what you are saying a while ago, and the stench here was unbearable - some apparently shall never forget the lesson they got during that Film 101.
I wish you could name those 200 superior to Maelstrom Hollywood films since the 1980, as I think you put your foot in your mouth firmly over that one.
Let us first know which Maelstrom we are talking about. I am referring to the one narrated by a Salmon out of Canada. Which one are you talking about?
And that is incompetant. TO be expected from you.
You brought it up in a completely silly way, now eat your lumps.Maybe you didn't exactly wtire it they way you meant... I mean - being an English Major?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: