Films/DVD Asylum

• Re: In French? - patrickU 23:15:47 03/27/04 (7)
  In Reply to: Maybe because you can't understand posted by RGA on March 27, 2004 at 17:56:44:

  And when I it happen to have only an English soundtrack it has mostly subtitles then, AND still I can understand a little bit of your language...
  No I think this film has no real deepth, It certainly has been writen for some one who died, but good intentions don´t make a good film.
  And it was WAY too larmoyant!!!
  
  

  ---

  • Re: In French? - RGA 23:39:33 03/27/04 (6)
    In Reply to: Re: In French? posted by patrickU on March 27, 2004 at 23:15:47:

    I think it's a lot smarter than you think it is...but oh well.
    
    

    ---

    • Re: In French? - patrickU 23:55:12 03/27/04 (5)
      In Reply to: Re: In French? posted by RGA on March 27, 2004 at 23:39:33:

      I took the pain to go right now through 3 reviews ( there are so manys! ), the one that match the best with my views of them was at:ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2004/02/25/21_grams_2004_review.shtml
      
      

      ---

      • Well - RGA 12:50:34 03/28/04 (4)
        In Reply to: Re: In French? posted by patrickU on March 27, 2004 at 23:55:12:

        I can produce a review too. The guy you posted still gave the film ***. 21 Grams is not a great movie - it's a good movie...the fact that it's in my top 3 says more about the quality of films over the year than it does about this film.

        My issue was more about the structiure than the content - which was solid...especially Del Torro's story which was the strongest storyline of the movie.
        

        • http://www.suntimes.com/ebert/ebert_reviews/2003/11/112606.html   (Open in New Window)

        
        

        ---

        • Re: Well - patrickU 23:45:15 03/28/04 (2)
          In Reply to: Well posted by RGA on March 28, 2004 at 12:50:34:

          It was not about the * but the contend of the critic I cited this article..I could have chose one who was REALLY bad...Did I write it was SO bad? I was just expecting more.
          Your " Ebert " review is not too far away from my present feeling. If you read trough his lines. Anyway this film is and will remain a failure for me.
          And I think more than one will be dissilutioned after a second or more visioning, I bet.
          
          
          

          ---

          • I have seen it again..., and enjoyed it once more! (nt) - orejones 01:26:18 03/29/04 (1)
            In Reply to: Re: Well posted by patrickU on March 28, 2004 at 23:45:15:

            
            
            

            ---

            • Re: Well, You knows Bernardo that I can take you as a reference ( and vice* versa )... - patrickU 02:36:11 03/29/04 (0)
              In Reply to: I have seen it again..., and enjoyed it once more! (nt) posted by orejones on March 29, 2004 at 01:26:18:

              When you like a film I don´t....

              * No, Audiophilander it does not mean what you think.
              
              

              ---
        • A few more blows... and Patrick will sucumb and agree - Victor Khomenko 15:26:42 03/28/04 (0)
          In Reply to: Well posted by RGA on March 28, 2004 at 12:50:34:

          So keep blowing.
          

          
          
          
          

          ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

VH Audio

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---