 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: "Close Encounters of the kaka Kind" posted by Analog Scott on April 06, 2004 at 17:17:40:
You see what for you is " fair question " is for me " pure impertinence ". Questionning some one who wrote about a film asking him if he ever saw it, goes above my imagination, but I suppose it will depend in what kind of society you are living in...
But it ainīt mine.
Follow Ups:
"You see what for you is " fair question " is for me " pure impertinence "." Questionning some one who wrote about a film asking him if he ever saw it, goes above my imagination, but I suppose it will depend in what kind of society you are living in...
But it ainīt mine. "I'm afraid it is yours given the fact that you are a regular on a message board where some people do attack films without seeing them.
Oh yeah! Who?
Victor for one. I see he has already jumped into this. Guess he already anticipated an obvious answer.
Another despicable liar visits us. Wasn't enough that we shoved your head in the latrin backet last time?
"Another despicable liar visits us."What lie would that be? You called the last Lord of the Rings movie kaka and you admitted that you haven't watched it. Aren't you the one who whines about personal attacks? I guess that makes you a bit of a hypocrite. Especially considering the truth is entirely on my side.
" Wasn't enough that we shoved your head in the latrin backet last time? "
You are in desperate need of a reality check. I suggest you pull your head out of said latrine and smell the coffee. All you did was fling feces like a money in a cage. You had your ass handed to you in our last exchange. I see it as a reoccuring theme in the future. I suggest you learn something about cinema before arguing about it.You will likely feel less compelled to resort to flinging fecal matter in the absense of anything substantial to say and you will likely get less egg on your face as well. Everyone will come out smelling better.
.
Boy you were easy to reduce to a grade school bully. Not worthy of discussion? Is this code for the hole you dug yourself into is simply too deep to talk your way out of? Here is your ass handed to you on a silver platter, once again.
Liars come in different shades.When caught, those who hade honor usually apologize.
Others - like AuPh did - will try to fade away, gently weasel out of the trap, obfuscate on their way out.
The third kind is the real scum - when caught they will continue pushing, getting nastier and nastier.
You obviously belong in the third category.
To see someone resort to filthy lies over something as insignificant as a disagreement on movies is disheartening. I am scared to think what you will do in more serious circumstances.
FIlthy scum liar you are.
Whoa there, Cochise! Your attempt at a clever euphemism for wimping out (i.e., "Others - like AuPh did - will try to fade away, gently weasel out of the trap, obfuscate on their way out") reads more like a personal testimonial, especially since it isn't reflective of any behavior of mine that I'm familiar with. However, on the bright side, it does appear that you've been bestowed with more imagination that I've given you credit for in the past. :o)OTOH, you do seem a bit confused by the fact that I don't hang around waiting with baited breath (pun intended) for your's or Patrick's next chicken-nugget of "wisdumb", but that's easily explained; BTW, all you had to do was ask. Truth is, I'm too busy to keep my e-mail linked for notification of replies, so I literally never know when one of my posts gets a response; sometimes I don't bother checking boards for several hours or even days, if at all. That may come across as some kind of nolo contendere (i.e., a declaration of having no defense) to you, but you'ld be in error, and it wouldn't be the first time!
FYI, failure to respond isn't an indication of surrender any more than it should be taken as a presumption of tacit agreement. So, if you're searching through the tea leaves in your Samovar for mea culpas, chickening out or weasels in your fox house based simply on my failure to respond, well Victor, you'd better switch to decaf.
Now even though Scott hasn't requested it, why don't you demonstrate what a nice chap you are (i.e., that you "have honor" when caught in a lie) and apologize to him for that "filthy scum liar" crack. It has left a distinct "kaka" scent upon the recent postings you've deposited in this thread.
Respectfully,
AuPh
.
(nt)
"Liars come in different shades. "What shade would you consider yourself? The fdacts show you are the liar. You admitted that you called ROTK kaka but did not watch it. Oh, I forgot, you don't want to discuss the issue. the facts get in the way of your name calling.
"When caught, those who hade honor usually apologize."You've been cuaght so apoplgize. Or are you going to be a hypocrite again?
"Others - like AuPh did - will try to fade away, gently weasel out of the trap, obfuscate on their way out."
Then folks like you ignore facts and fling feces like a caged monkey. Your tactics are the worst kind.
"The third kind is the real scum - when caught they will continue pushing, getting nastier and nastier."
Look in the mirror Victor. You just described yourself perfectly.
"You obviously belong in the third category."
You wouldn't know the obvious if it bit you in the ass. You already proved that with your multitude of mindless arogant posts on film. The facts are simple. I nailed you for calling a film kaka that you didn't see. Now you are calling me a liar. You are the liar. The sort you describe here. But of course, you don't want to discuss it. Discussion of facts only gets in the way of your idiotic, selfrighteous, hypocritical attacks on others who call you out on the carpet.
"To see someone resort to filthy lies over something as insignificant as a disagreement on movies is disheartening."
It must be disheartening for you to look in the mirror
" I am scared to think what you will do in more serious circumstances.
FIlthy scum liar you are."
Monday morning quarterback internet geeks like yourself never present more serious circumstances. You and your opinions are nothing in the film world. Are you this much of a prick when you do business? If so I think I may have to audition your amps. They must be pretty awsome for dealers to have to endure your personality. Or do you kiss ass off line?
But be prepared for some healthy weaseling on part of AuPh. If you say you saw part of it and lost interest AuPh will insist you are not qualified because you didn't stay till the end.If you say you did, he will say you are not qualified because you didn't stay for dinner after the film.
And that you didn't participate in a group discussion after dinner...
And...
Truth is, he was so badly wiped last time he is dying to pick up new fight. Apparently his behind has healed.
It has not.
Nope. He got an answer. You were the answer. Funny you jumped in now. Maybe you saw it comming.
I realize that you two have a serious case of "olive parrot" dysentery when it comes to films, but confessing the crappiness of your contributions is the first step on the road to recovery; I applaud you for it! BTW, I never caught GPD (Grey Poupon's Disease) because I didn't drink from your tainted well of knowledge. As for the weaseling charge, how can folks who spread so much BS around about decadent European movies, like you guys do, fail to recognize the diagnosis, treatment and cure I provided from the last go 'round? Sorry dude, but this time most of us are immunized!Now, it's time to change reels. :o)
AuPh
I remember vaguely that is is a liberal...If that is one how must be the extreme right?
;^)
nt
Who knows, the day might come when he will surprise you by saying there are some good ones.
:o)
nt
;^)
I thought that was a compliment. Would you rather be watching the stuff AuPh grew up with in his small Texas town?Decadent European movies... see, now you will feel guilty watching the Japanese or American movies that you like.
You might refresh your memory to the fact that when I caught you with clear lies and called you a liar in your face, you smarly decided to simply quietly fade away without any further fight. I let you go that time, feeling that being publicly caught lying was enough embarrassement for you.I might be less generous next time. Today you are gently weaseling around, afraid of repeating that episode.
Smart. Change that reel now.
> > > "I caught you with clear lies..." < < <LOL! I like the choice of your phrasing here; I'm sure that you do tell lots of whoppers that catch folks off guard!
> > > "...you smarly[sic] decided to quickly quietly fade away..." < < <
Sorry, but you might understand my getting bored with your anti-Hollywood rants and Euro-cinema crusades.
> > > "I might be less generous next time." < < <
To paraphrase your feckless leader: "Bring it on!"
AuPh
Dig your own filth.
You responded to my pointing this out no more than 3 minutes after asking Analog Scott who attacks films without seeing them. Gotcha! ;^)AuPh
Clark Johnsen (i.e., in fairness, he may not be the only one) has been known to post reviews from secondary sources of movies which he hasn't seen; he has even gone so far as to agree with the review simply because he approves of the "reviewer's tastes". So, given these circumstances perhaps you can understand why someone might query you about having seen a movie or a version of a movie that you've dissed with little or no explanation.BTW, I think Victor needs to clean your cage; too much kaka! ;^)
AuPh
And choose you for the cage cleaning.....As we all live in cage. More or less.
... your's & Victor's! ;^)AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
