Films/DVD Asylum

You will not get no answer

69.67.10.47

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

Victor Khomenko

(M)

In Reply to: Re: "Close Encounters of the worst Kind" posted by patrickU on April 07, 2004 at 11:39:08:

But be prepared for some healthy weaseling on part of AuPh. If you say you saw part of it and lost interest AuPh will insist you are not qualified because you didn't stay till the end.
If you say you did, he will say you are not qualified because you didn't stay for dinner after the film.
And that you didn't participate in a group discussion after dinner...
And...
Truth is, he was so badly wiped last time he is dying to pick up new fight. Apparently his behind has healed.

Follow Ups:

Re: You will not get no answer - patrickU 01:25:27 04/08/04 (0)
It has not.
Re: You will not get no answer - Analog Scott 16:28:05 04/07/04 (0)
Nope. He got an answer. You were the answer. Funny you jumped in now. Maybe you saw it comming.
"...so badly wiped..." Interesting admission/analogy about the "quality" of your own posts. - Audiophilander 14:52:37 04/07/04 (11)
I realize that you two have a serious case of "olive parrot" dysentery when it comes to films, but confessing the crappiness of your contributions is the first step on the road to recovery; I applaud you for it! BTW, I never caught GPD (Grey Poupon's Disease) because I didn't drink from your tainted well of knowledge. As for the weaseling charge, how can folks who spread so much BS around about decadent European movies, like you guys do, fail to recognize the diagnosis, treatment and cure I provided from the last go 'round? Sorry dude, but this time most of us are immunized!
Now, it's time to change reels. :o)
AuPh
- Re: Decadent European movies. Did I hear right? - patrickU 01:29:29 04/08/04 (7)
  I remember vaguely that is is a liberal...If that is one how must be the extreme right?
  - Not "all" European movies are decadent, just the ones you and Victor babble on ad nauseum about. (nt) - Audiophilander 09:49:41 04/08/04 (5)
    ;^)
    - Re: Oh, really ? You have a good point. nt - patrickU 09:51:13 04/08/04 (4)
      nt
      - Don't scare him now... he is making obvious progress! - Victor Khomenko 10:14:19 04/08/04 (3)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Oh, really ? You have a good point. nt posted by patrickU on April 08, 2004 at 09:51:13:
        
        Who knows, the day might come when he will surprise you by saying there are some good ones.
        
        Oh, there are! It's just that most of them are silent and almost all the rest were made before 1950. (nt) - Audiophilander 23:02:22 04/08/04 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Don't scare him now... he is making obvious progress! posted by Victor Khomenko on April 08, 2004 at 10:14:19:
        
        :o)
        
        Re: Ok, I will restrain my cynical side. nt - patrickU 10:27:07 04/08/04 (1)
        
        In Reply to: Don't scare him now... he is making obvious progress! posted by Victor Khomenko on April 08, 2004 at 10:14:19:
        
        nt
        
        I'd have that looked at if I were you; the bandage may not stop the decay from turning gangrenous! (nt) - Audiophilander 23:08:54 04/08/04 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Ok, I will restrain my cynical side. nt posted by patrickU on April 08, 2004 at 10:27:07:
        
        ;^)
  - Re: Decadent European movies. Did I hear right? - Victor Khomenko 06:13:28 04/08/04 (0)
    I thought that was a compliment. Would you rather be watching the stuff AuPh grew up with in his small Texas town?
    Decadent European movies... see, now you will feel guilty watching the Japanese or American movies that you like.
- Re: "...so badly wiped..." Interesting admission/analogy about the "quality" of your own posts. - Victor Khomenko 17:08:34 04/07/04 (2)
  You might refresh your memory to the fact that when I caught you with clear lies and called you a liar in your face, you smarly decided to simply quietly fade away without any further fight. I let you go that time, feeling that being publicly caught lying was enough embarrassement for you.
  I might be less generous next time. Today you are gently weaseling around, afraid of repeating that episode.
  Smart. Change that reel now.
  - Sorry, but I must have missed the last reel of your saccharine melodrama; please fill in the details? - Audiophilander 20:04:40 04/07/04 (1)
    > > > "I caught you with clear lies..." < < <
    LOL! I like the choice of your phrasing here; I'm sure that you do tell lots of whoppers that catch folks off guard!
    > > > "...you smarly[sic] decided to quickly quietly fade away..." < < <
    Sorry, but you might understand my getting bored with your anti-Hollywood rants and Euro-cinema crusades.
    > > > "I might be less generous next time." < < <
    To paraphrase your feckless leader: "Bring it on!"
    AuPh
    - Re: Sorry, but I must have missed the last reel of your saccharine melodrama; please fill in the details? - Victor Khomenko 20:24:02 04/07/04 (0)
      Dig your own filth.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Parts Connexion

You can not post to an archived thread.