|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: Signs was one of the worst film I ever saw.nt posted by Rob Doorack on May 05, 2004 at 11:24:49:
The difference would be that by Ed Wood it would have turn cult some thirty years later, here we have no chance to see the same pheneomena. The first part was just playing with the spectator which of course is legitim as long you donīt see the ropes.
Helas, they are very gross. But for the first fifteen minutes I was intrigue too,then...
The rest is as you said.
Plainly stupid and empty.
Made for debile. ( sound arrogant? good...)
Follow Ups:
Another difference between Signs and Plan 9 From Outer Space is that the latter rewards repeated viewing and the former does not. There's so much hilariously bad moviemaking in Plan 9 that you can't possibly catch all of it in one viewing.
Yes, so beautifully dilettante, that it is fascinating, even if I manage to only have one viewing of Plan9...
As for the above cited sentance, it is not far from the truth.
The religious part was like a version for the poor from " The exorsist ".
Bad. Very bad.
That I have no connection to the film whatsoever. And no, I didn't much care for Signs either.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: