Audio Asylum Thread Printer

Get a view of an entire thread on one page

FAQ / News / Events

Films/DVD Asylum

Re: You know, its kind of fun......

24.7.223.210

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ] [ FAQ ]

In Reply to: You know, its kind of fun...... posted by Joe S on April 20, 2000 at 06:45:20:

I agree with much that you write - in fact all but from a different angle of perspective. While I dont like the fuzzies (actually I detest them), I am not sure that you should conclude that it is today's audience that he is catering to. I think the percentage of people who like the fuzzy crap is probably unchanged (or at least let us presume that it is for a moment) The problem is with him and his perception of what he thinks the younger generation wants. After all, he is more far removed in age from today's gen x than he was removed in age difference from his previous audiences , right? In other words, he is closer in age to you even when you were younger than he is to today's young people. Really, so often people think they understand the kids. I dont have any and I dont understand them fully. My attorney who grew up in the 60s kept telling me how her nieces and nephews had no causes etc. etc. all complaints about GEn X. She could say that to me (33 now), because I grew up elsewhere I guess. However, i kept showing her actual facts about saving rates, etc. etc. that refuted most of what she said. Of course only in America do we need to categorise everyone.
Another point...
things I liked at a younger age are sometimes as appealing today but ONLY because i somehow "recall" the pleasure I got from my first viewing of it. Having grown up in a country with very little good entertainment, i took delight in some absolute crap. But I wont even be able to watch it today. On the other hand, some other things which I sort of liked, I may like as much today though I WOULD NOT HAVE LIKED IT as much if i saw it today for the FIRST TIME. When you describe how you liked SW original episodes, I suspect that at least some of the liking may be because of how you saw the movie at the age you were then. If you saw it for the first time today.... I cannot say for sure that you would not have liked it so so much but I am not sure . You would certainly have liked it.
Frankly, this is just a pet idea of mine about how people enjoy things. Am interested in your feedback. I have found movies to be the best way to bring this sense of perception out.
Cheers. No offense intended.

Follow Ups:

Re: You know, its kind of fun...... Joe S 17:29:09 04/20/00 (6)
Absolutely no offense taken :-)
I agree, I dont really belive it is todays audience he is catering to. I think its more a shift in focus to kids and it deos seem he hits that mark quite well. My friends with children who went to Phantom Menace have told me of their offspring's rapt attention and post movie interest. Its just that his original pictures had the same effect on adults - but judging by my response and many of my friends that doesnt seem to be true any longer.
But I know what you mean about seperating things from their original context. Things we saw earlier in life often do become entwined with our long term tastes in interesting ways. There are movies I recall from my childhood that hit me at a level far beyond their value and content that make them special to this day (the original Bond flicks with Sean Connery for example). And while I'm sure I'd still like them if I was seeing them for the first time now, I'm equally sure they wouldnt resonate in quite the way they do when I see them again in the context of my past experience...
Cheers!
joe
- funny you should say that ...... Mart 00:39:14 04/21/00 (5)
  The thing that absolutely floored me at the time was the openning scene in Star Wars. The perspective was so tremendous as the Empire ship just kept growing ... WOW!!! But, to see it now I only get a residual twang from remembering the original WOW.
  As far as a kiggy show is concerned, di we forget this is a Sci-Fi fairy tail with evil kings & wizards & an underdog hero?
  My problem isn't with the doo-tads & other gimmicks or whatever that prejudicial BS was about, but where was the drama? Even during the pod racing scene (a computer generated Ben Hur chariot recreation), there was no anticipation, no fear, no concern, nada. I kept saying "yeah, they spent a great deal of money here ... next". I guess it would've helped if I gave a damn about the characters. Nobody bothered to develope them into anything beyond the thickness of the celluloid.
  What was he thinking? Doesn't he have a set of people who're gifted enough not to be brown-nosers? Somebody should've screamed something!!!
  - Re: funny you should say that ...... Joe S 08:45:12 04/21/00 (4)
    I think all of that comes from catering to a less critical audience of children. Yes indeed no drama, and the acting of the lead was so wooden and unconvincing as to be offensive - but those are things young kids apparently arent too critical of.
    Yes the original SW flicks required a suspension of disbelief and were hardly profound - but they did have drama, action, beleivable characters and acceptable acting. Of course a big element was the pace which kept things moving along in a convincing manner so that you didnt think to hard as it all flew by.
    But the latest movie was such a directorial cop out. You're right about the lack of caharcters, but even more irritaing at times was the script which simply failed to make its points in any credible way. A character says he senses menace in the young acting challenged munchkin and yet nothing in the kids behavior or in the flow of the movie itself illustrates it? Thats just lazy directing and insulting to the audience.
    The problem is that the fuzzies and toys are the drivers. He's realized he can make crap movies which target kids with underdevloped characters and lame scripts and make his money in the toy store rather than simply at the box office. Hence, instead of focusing on crafting the best movie he can he makes the best child targeted toy commercial instead.
    And unfortunately he's making a killing at it with all the promo ties ins, so I really doubt we'll ever see a legimate movie from Lucas again...
    This is the crux of my objection to the fuzzies and figures.
    joe
    - symptom v. disease late 09:29:27 04/21/00 (3)
      hi,
      Lucas, is rich, no, i mean really rich. His accountants need training in relativistic physics just to describe roughly how rich he is. He is also a control freak, with a real problem of delegating.
      Can you say Peter Principle?
      - So I guess that means... Joe S 15:30:06 04/21/00 (2)
        
        In Reply to: symptom v. disease posted by late on April 21, 2000 at 09:29:27:
        
        ...In space, no one can tell you you're wrong.
        joe
        
        or ... Mart 19:05:16 04/21/00 (1)
        
        In Reply to: So I guess that means... posted by Joe S on April 21, 2000 at 15:30:06:
        
        "nothing so vacuous as deep space"
        ...or, again, in his case, he's so dense ...
        "even enlightenment can't leave"
        
        Re: or ... Ran 11:22:39 04/22/00 (0)
        
        In Reply to: or ... posted by Mart on April 21, 2000 at 19:05:16:
        
        You said --
        "even enlightenment can't leave"
        Well said Sort of like a
        Black Hole huh?

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

You can not post to an archived thread.