|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
Guys, grab your ball caps, don you Nikes, work up some extra testosterone, and drag your knuckles on down to the picture show. You got some excellent combat and action to see.This was an excellent adventure. Well acted, well choreographed, great cast--the CGI was terrific and nearly transparent. Brian Cox gets my kudos for playing a deliciously malevolent Agamemnon and O'Toole for a sympathetic King of Troy. Bana played an upright Hector while Bloom pulled up the rear with a weasely Paris. As expected, Pitt was the weakest link but not distracting. Diane Kruger, Helen, is gorgeous and well worth a war.
The single combat tops what I've seen lately and the brief views of the battle lines clashing smack of how it was really done eons ago.
Not a dull moment in this film--sure it compresses ten years into what appears to be several weeks, but that's okay too. It moves along quite nicely.
Peterson has outdone Ridley. He narrowed the scope of the story and did not over-"spectacle-ize" the subject.
My fave line: Polyadora to Achilles -- "I though you were a dumb brute. I could forgive a dumb brute."
Follow Ups:
TROY / ** (R)
May 14, 2004Achilles: Brad Pitt
Paris: Orlando Bloom
Hector: Eric Bana
Helen: Diane Kruger
Odysseus: Sean Bean
Agamemnon: Brian Cox
Priam: Peter O'Toole
Menelaus: Brendan Gleeson
Andreomache: Saffron BurrowsWarner Bros. presents a film directed by Wolfgang Petersen. Written by David Benioff. Running time: 162 minutes. Rated R (for graphic violence and some sexuality/nudity.)
BY ROGER EBERT
"Troy" is based on the epic poem The Iliad by Homer, according to the credits. Homer's estate should sue. The movie sidesteps the existence of the Greek gods, turns its heroes into action movie cliches and demonstrates that we're getting tired of computer-generated armies. Better a couple of hundred sweaty warriors than two masses of 50,000 men marching toward one another across a sea of special effects.
The movie recounts the legend of the Trojan War, as the fortress city is attacked by a Greek army led by Menelaus of Sparta and Agamemnon of Mycenae. The war has become necessary because of the lust of the young Trojan prince named Paris (Orlando Bloom), who while during a peace mission to Sparta, seduces the city-state's queen, Helen (Diane Kruger).
This action understandably annoys Helen's husband, Menelaus (Brendan Gleeson), not to mention Paris' brother Hector (Eric Bana), who points out, quite correctly, that when you visit a king on a peace mission, it is counterproductive to leave with his wife.
What the movie doesn't explain is why Helen would leave with Paris after an acquaintanceship of a few nights. Is it because her loins throb with passion for a hero? No, because she tells him: "I don't want a hero. I want a man I can grow old with." Not in Greek myth, you don't. If you believe Helen of Troy could actually tell Paris anything remotely like that, you will probably also agree that the second night he slipped into her boudoir, she told him, "Last night was a mistake."
The seduction of Helen is the curtain-raiser for the main story, which involves vast Greek armies laying siege to the impenetrable city. Chief among their leaders is Achilles, said to be the greatest warrior of all time, but played by Brad Pitt as if he doesn't believe it. If Achilles was anything, he was a man who believed his own press releases. Heroes are not introspective in Greek drama, they do not have second thoughts, and they are not conflicted.
Achilles is all of these things. He mopes on the flanks of the Greek army with his own independent band of fighters, carrying out a separate diplomatic policy, kind of like Ollie North. He thinks Agamemnon is a poor leader with bad strategy and doesn't really get worked up until his beloved cousin Patroclus (Garrett Hedlund) is killed in battle.
Patroclus, who looks a little like Achilles, wears his helmet and armor to fool the enemy, and until the helmet is removed everyone thinks that Achilles has been slain. So dramatic is that development that the movie shows perhaps 100,000 men in hand-to-hand combat, and then completely forgets them in order to focus on the Patroclus battle scene, with everybody standing around like during a fight on the playground.
Pitt is a good actor and a handsome man, and he worked out for six months to get buff for the role, but Achilles is not a character he inhabits comfortably. Say what you will about Charlton Heston and Victor Mature, but one good way to carry off a sword-and-sandal epic is to be filmed by a camera down around your knees, while you intone quasi-formal prose in a heroic baritone. Pitt is modern, nuanced, introspective; he brings complexity to a role where it is not required.
By treating Achilles and the other characters as if they were human, instead of the larger-than-life creations of Greek myth, director Wolfgang Petersen miscalculates. What happens in Greek myth cannot happen between psychologically plausible characters. That's the whole point of myth. Great films like Michael Cacoyannis' "Elektra," about the murder of Agamemnon after the Trojan War, know that and use a stark dramatic approach that is deliberately stylized. Of course, "Elektra" wouldn't work for a multiplex audience, but then maybe it shouldn't.
The best scene in the movie has Peter O'Toole creating an island of drama and emotion in the middle of all that plodding dialogue. He plays old King Priam of Troy, who at night ventures outside his walls and into the enemy camp, surprising Achilles in his tent. Achilles has defeated Priam's son Hector in hand-to-hand combat before the walls of Troy, and dragged his body back to camp behind his chariot. Now Priam asks that the body be returned for proper preparation and burial. This scene is given the time and attention it needs to build its mood, and we believe it when Achilles tells Priam, "You're a far better king than the one who leads this army." O'Toole's presence is a reminder of "Lawrence of Arabia" (1962), which I saw again two weeks ago, and which proved that patience with dialogue and character is more important than action in making war movies work.
As for the Greek cities themselves, a cliche from the old Hollywood epics has remained intact. This is the convention that whenever a battle of great drama takes place, all the important characters have box seats for it. When Achilles battles Hector before the walls of Troy, for example, Priam and his family have a sort of viewing stand right at the front of the palace, and we get the usual crowd reaction shots, some of them awkward closeups of actresses told to look grieved.
In a way, "Troy" resembles "The Alamo." Both are about fortresses under siege. Both are defeated because of faulty night watchmen. The Mexicans sneak up on the Alamo undetected, and absolutely nobody is awake to see the Greeks climbing out of the Trojan Horse. One difference between the two movies is that Billy Bob Thornton and the other "Alamo" actors are given evocative dialogue, and deliver it well, while "Troy" provides dialogue that probably cannot be delivered well because it would sound even sillier that way.
Copyright © Chicago Sun-Times Inc.
he gave this movie one star too many. This is one bore of a movie. I almost walked out in the first half of the movie.I am not a big fan of Gladiator, but this movie in no way even comes close to Gladiator. That's how boring this movie is. Besides, I don't understand why they had to change the Iliad story to that degree.
with Ebert once I too have seen the film...I will probably have to see this only because my wife is in love with Pitt and will drag me to it...At least it doesn't have Russell Crowe in it, who in my opinion is a highly over-rated actor.
to satisfy Ebert's need for accuracy and tone. Wolfgang modernized the characters by humanizing them. That is obvious. Only O'Toole came close to delivering the old-time, classic characterization of toga epics that Ebert wanted to see.I find usually find Ebert agreeable, but not this time. He was looking for too much and missed the energy of the film.
NT
.
NT
nt
On the other hand, David Denby of the New Yorker DID like it.
a few weeks ago here as my favorite line. Katleen Turner to William Hurt, "You're not very smart, are you.........................I like that in a man."
IMHO, Pitt was not the weakest link. He was perfectly cast--a narcissistic killing machine. I really like him in this role--he exuded supreme self-confidence; he was intimidating in battle.I think Eric Bana was unconvincing as Hector of Troy. He was supposed to be Troy's greatest warrior, but he seemed to struggle as a warrior. Just an opinion.
Overall, a great movie. It will be joining by DVD collection later this year.
Pitt is not known for depth and I found his Achilles rather mono-dimensional. (I went to a 17:30 showing and there were several gaggles of teen girls there--we know why.)Bana showed a Hector that had some sense and who was intimidated by Achilles. He added humanity to the role.
I appreciated the moments of irony when both Hector and Paris gave O'Toole the right advice which he did not promptly follow.
"Yep, this one will take Gladiator's place on the DVD shelf."I was actually getting enthusiastic about seeing Troy soon until you said this. BTW, I can't stand "Gladiator" and think it's got to be the most overrated film of the decade (well... there is Titanic).
n
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: