Films/DVD Asylum

Posted by Victor Khomenko on April 25, 2000 at 08:28:08:

In Reply to: actually... posted by late on April 25, 2000 at 07:41:19:

***i am looking for someone who can provide a dispassionate legal analysis of the situation. If you find something, please let me know.
The treaty obligations appear straightforward enough, as does the
tradition of placing a child in the custody of the parents as a matter of course. But this situation involves skirting both matters (on the side of the relatives); and on the side of the govt, whether their handling of the situation is proper. To be honest, what i am hearing is a lot of hot air; but i like to keep track of such things when i can.

You got the point here - there is a disagreement. Perhaps both sides are not acting properly.

That menas: COURT should decide. The safe house was the right step - they unite, stay together, the due process goes on, attorneys have access to their clients. In few weeks the decision is made - and end of story.

This was vetoed by Clinton/Castro team. Now we have executive decisions instead of court ones.