|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Fahrenheit 9/11: the growing critical consensus... posted by Audiophilander on June 17, 2004 at 16:34:22:
it generally takes a 7.2 or above for a movie to be worth seeing. Also, judging from Michael Moore's past pictures, it will likely be laced with deceit and propganda. Save your money and pass on this one.
Follow Ups:
You've seen it?
Michael Moore's films aren't any more propagandistic than Fox News.Deceit? That's a serious charge. Cite something--a fact, an argument, etc.---from a Moore film that was intentionally deceitful.
I second that. I actually canceled my cable subscription to not contribute to that propaganda channel... oreilly (a self-proclaim christian!) is unlistenable and I can't believe that guy is not put off the air. I hope his audience take all his silly crap with humour and don't give him much credit.
...is not to take him too seriously. Most people don't get that; hence bad reviews and a lot of huffing and puffing. However, it is becoming more and more difficult to view Moore's films this way. Oh, to return to the good clean fun of TV Nation . Nevertheless, I haven't missed a Moore work yet and won't miss this one.
zzzzzzz
nt
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: