|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: " Whether intentional or not "..Oh boy! what a man of bad faith! posted by patrickU on June 17, 2004 at 23:44:10:
...I was trying to make is that it doesn't really matter what thought processes Mr. Moore employed in selecting his documentary's title as long as that title conveys the correct message and doesn't violate any copyright/trademark laws! Ray Bradbury may be unhappy, and he may even "feel" violated, but he's suffered no damage to his reputation or that of his book; I'm sure that he's aware of this even if he's grumbling over tha fact that Michael Moore's film doesn't agree with his own political viewpoint.BTW Patrick, and no offense, but if you can't tell the difference between a grammatical device and hedging then perhaps your opinions would be best served posting on European boards. Now if you know what's good for you you'll stick that finger you like to point at folks (i.e., when you don't know what you're talking about) back in the dyke before you drown!
Follow Ups:
nt
There's a difference between teasing (casual jibes) and nastiness directed at one's wife and relatives, n'est ce pas?
If that is an insult what are all the things you wrote to me.
Nastiness to relatives? Well that is a mistery to me where and how I insulte your wife? Or relatives.
...but it implied a 'henpecked' status which does not exist in our household. Mentioning any mother/wife's panties is beneath you, perhaps literally, if you're wearing them yourself! ;^)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: