 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Is Tarantino our Little American Pasolini? posted by Victor Khomenko on July 14, 2004 at 18:18:30:
His directing style is efficient and his movies have always been highly profitable for their budgets (notice no CG in his movies). He'll have studio support for at least a few more films.The "war movie" he keeps talking about developing might just be his big fat turkey though.
Tom §.
Follow Ups:
.
I thought it was regular doublecross/crime story where the "hook" is mainly derived from the suspense from wondering who's going to get doublecrossed. Watching it for a second time isn't worth it because the hook isn't there and the interest in the narrative is deflated to zilch. I wouldn't call it a turkey because it still turned a tidy profit and it was an OK film on first viewing.A war movie on the other hand is going to be big budget with military equipment, armies of extras, and special effects unless it's all set in a command center or underground bunker. Tarantino doing a genre that's inherently violent (but not intended to be viewed as cartoonish like Kung Fu/Samurai as was the case with KB) could be too much for anyone to find authentic enough for the suspension of belief required for the narrative.
Tom §.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
