 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Slimy liar posted by Victor Khomenko on July 30, 2004 at 17:06:56:
A "SINGLE word of truth" is generously provided in the subject line. There are many more, but you're obviously not ready for them.*** "After that (i.e., having seen the film) you can come back here and belittle my opinions all you like in a thread about Fahrenheit 9/11; in the mean time, you haven't paid the price of admission." ***
>>> "Where did I belittled you opinion on that film?" <<<
Read my comment again s-l-o-w-l-y, and then THINK about it: My point was that before jumping into a thread to criticise someone else's opinion you should at least take the time to see the film being discussed yourself. Patrick is supposedly an adult; you don't have to wipe his nose every time someone disagrees with him over a film he trashes.
By involving yourself in a difference of opinion between two individuals who maintain TOTALLY different perspectives on a film they've seen, you're taking sides. Since you haven't seen the film in question, that makes you a kibitzer! If you don't understand the meaning of that Yiddish word, especially MY meaning of it, then I suggest looking it up in Webster's; you probably won't like it.
Food for thought, mull it over and have a nice evening,
AuPh
Follow Ups:
I presume in your trailer park it is normal to lie about people and never apologize, but here we consider this behavior one of scum and trash, and you have done very well with it.The smallness of your mind is obvious in the fact that you never answer any direct question, you instead try to constantly change the subject in order to avoid exposure.
Filthy liar you are, and I hope this thread stays, as I will be constantly refering to it in the future.
You apparently don't fathom how arrogant, petty and off base you appear here. You accuse others of lying while lying yourself, you stick your nose into situations that are none of your concern while having no clue about the subject being discussed, and you expect an apology when your own errors in judgment have resulted in almost all of the rancor.> > > "I presume in your trailer park..." < < <
That's odd, because after seeing Fahrenheit 9/11 and reading the outrageous comments you've made in this thread one might assume that you currently live in one of two places: 1) A ranch on the outskirts of Crawford Texas, and 2) 2600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington D.C. (until January, 2005)
Take care! :o)
Regards,
AuPh
Patrick posted his view of a film.You responded immediately with personal insult. As many of know, and as clark loves to point out, you always insult people when you have nothing to say.
In your "retort" you said nothing about the film, you simply insulted the poster. Apparently you are quite jelous of his friendship with me, and to a small person like you this is enough justification for an insult.
Of course a rude insult like this demanded a response, and I properly slapped you in the face. And of course my response did not say anything about the film, but everything about your trailer trash behavior. The behavior appropriate of the sewer, but not the forums where people try to exchange their opinions on films.
To that ou replied with lies. When I asked you to substantiate your lies, you of course changed the subject, eventually dropping down to the gutter level, suggesting that my criticism of your RUDE behavior and lack of civilized manners was equal to my endorsing a particular viewpoint.
Given your typical rhetorics found on Outside, where you are rightly considered a king of hypocrisy, this was not surprising.
What IS disgusting and slightly surprising, is your desire to bring your trashy morals here, to the forum where most people manage to stay away from personal petty insults.
So, you filthy liar, let me slap you in the face once again, and once again, ask you: what exactly did I say about that film in this thread?
If folks want to see what was really said and how you inserted yourself into the conversation without having seen the film they can simply click on the Film Asylum button and scroll down to the thread.Facts:
1) You jumped into a conversation over a film you hadn't seen.
2) You insulted me personally when I hadn't even addressed you.
3) You persisted, ignoring my recommendation that you see the film first.
4) In his original post, Patrick's remarks were arguably inflamatory, inviting my strong response.
5) I did apologize for ruffling Patrick's feathers after suggesting that he was your pet parrot. ;^)
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
