Films/DVD Asylum

Does guano work better for ya, Batman, or do you prefer Die Fledermaus? (nt)

24.0.34.251

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

Audiophilander

(A)

In Reply to: He knows how far he can push. (nt) posted by Victor Khomenko on August 28, 2004 at 06:46:51:

;^)

Follow Ups:

You truly have no class. - Victor Khomenko 09:18:17 08/28/04 (1)
Decent people consider dragging the professional affiliations into such discussion beneath their dignity... but not you.
- I was not refering to your professional affiliations, ... - Audiophilander 00:38:59 08/29/04 (0)
  ...but it's not surprising that you'ld draw the wrong inference as long as it suits your purpose (i.e., FYI, you use a flying "bat" symbol in your posts and you & Patrick team up like a caricature of the dynamic duo a'la Joel Schumaker era to fight for Bush's Justices and the Amerikan way; it seemed like an obvious analogy, but perhaps Don Quixote would provide a better one!).
  Regards,
  AuPh
Re: Die Fledermaus...At least you manage to get THAT word right....nt - patrickU 08:54:45 08/28/04 (7)
nt
- Now all that remains is for you & Victor to team up with director Joel Schumaker for the movie! - Audiophilander 09:11:02 08/28/04 (6)
  Suggestion for the sequel's title: "Batman & Robin: Men in Tights" ;^)
  Cheers,
  AuPh
  - Re: Men in Tights? - patrickU 09:13:57 08/28/04 (5)
    You should live up to your expectation.
    Do you like dressing up in robes? Tell us and don�t worry we love all people...
    - It was a joke: Robin Hood: Men In Tights; Batman & Robin: Men In Tights... get it? - Audiophilander 00:42:51 08/29/04 (4)
      Sheeeeesh! I guess humor will have to be off your menu until you get over your alergy to it.
      AuPh
      - Re: Hey Baby, you did not get it. nt - patrickU 00:55:50 08/29/04 (3)
        
        In Reply to: It was a joke: Robin Hood: Men In Tights; Batman & Robin: Men In Tights... get it? posted by Audiophilander on August 29, 2004 at 00:42:51:
        
        nt
        
        The difference: - Audiophilander 07:29:42 08/29/04 (2)
        
        In Reply to: Re: Hey Baby, you did not get it. nt posted by patrickU on August 29, 2004 at 00:55:50:
        
        Your robe remark makes no sense whatsoever without a specific film reference, but by your reaction I suspect that my sarcasm has hit it's mark; let's just leave it at that, shall we?
        AuPh
        
        Re: We shall. As you still did not get it. nt - patrickU 07:31:19 08/29/04 (1)
        
        In Reply to: The difference: posted by Audiophilander on August 29, 2004 at 07:29:42:
        
        nt
        
        Like I said, there's nothing "there" to get. - Audiophilander 12:11:45 08/31/04 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Re: We shall. As you still did not get it. nt posted by patrickU on August 29, 2004 at 07:31:19:
        
        I doubt that anyone else got diddly squat out of your attempted riposte either. Let's move on; I'm sure you'll figure out some new way of embarassing yourself in another thread. ;^)
        AuPh

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

VH Audio

You can not post to an archived thread.