|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.178.211.66
Aside from a trailer or two on TV when it was released, I've heard very little about this movie. I'd read the novel by M. Crichton on a flight a few years ago so I grabbed it off the rental rack on impulse. I half expected it to be a turkey, but was surprised at how entertaining this typical time travel adventure was. Much more historically accurate than most middle ages flicks and the medieval night battle scene was really good; trebuchets and all. The plot and characters are sketchy; which is too bad...they should have been developed much more, but as a pure adventure movie it was quite enjoyable.
Follow Ups:
The book was OK---I avoided the movie, because I thought it would be too "Hollywood-ized". Perhaps I'll check it out...
I have the book, and while probably much better than the movie(judging by trailers), even the book wasn't all that great IMo as far as Crichton goes..
If underexposed, justly so. I found this very weak. It emphasized action over the wonder and paradoxical problems of time travel. I couldn't get through it. I also thought the acting was mediocre. Crichton has done better, far better, but you have to blame the film makers for this one.
I do agree the book wasn't near one of Crichton's better stories. Actually, having read (and been bored by) the book, I think the movie was better. While it ignored the more dramatic issues you raise, it was more authentic at portraying the medieval environment than 99%, and I found that element alone worth the grand rental charge of 99 cents.I don't understand the mindset of studios that spend huge sums on production of a period piece like this, but completely ignore the story potential that could be dramatically improved at little cost.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: