|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
217.86.2.93
In Reply to: LoTR's three films are a marvelous epic; OTOH, your's & patrick's opines make Ebert & Roper look like friggin' geniuses. posted by Audiophilander on November 17, 2004 at 12:48:16:
The same tune with so many variations ad nauseatum ...Try to explore other alternatives of thinking and writing, once we have read one of your missives we read them all.
You are boring.
Follow Ups:
;^)> > > "The same tune with so many variations ad nauseatum[sic] ..." < < <
Yeah, ...maybe ...just maybe you're beginning to get a clue, but if that is the case then you should inform your tag-team mate, Mr. V-chip-on-his-shoulder, ASAP. You see, there's no reason to vary one's comments when all we see is the same tired coprolitic sh*t from you guys! Don't kid yourself, you and Victor are the ad nauseum champs here.
> > > "You are boring." < < <
Ah, since you're speaking subjectively, quite possibly, but my topical posts aren't directed to just one or two people. BTW, objectivity isn't something we've come to expect from either you or Victor, so I'll rely on a wider consensus if you don't mind.
LoTR is a magnificent series of films; they're classics, PERIOD. If you don't like 'em for whatever reason(s), that's fine, but trashing works of artistic merit with ridiculous comments about cretinism personally insults everyone who appreciates Peter Jackson's epic achievement. I'll politely add that you & Victor should try to get over yourselves and learn to respect the tastes of others, especially if you want folks to give the works you feel passionately about a second thought.
And I new you would not missed it! Kaka....Hein? You are so predictible!
But in a way you are fascinating the way you turn things around.
And the pervers way you tend to isolate people is Faschistoid.
Every one is entitle to have fun with debile films.
You too.
Particulary you.
Something must be lost in translation. My Webster's New World Broken-English Dictionary has no listing for "debile." At first, I thought maybe this is a pun, but naw, that requires cleverness. So, patrick, would you care to elaborate?
You can always ask me, I'll help you... even if you don't deserve it.Yes, LOTR is a horrible dreck. It was irritating in the extreme. But you may keep polishing that turd.
Victor, questions which beg to be asked:
(1) Which LOTR was "horrible dreck and irritating?"
A) If Part I was horrible dreck, then was Part II and III horrible dreck and irritating?B) If so, then why would you watch Part II and Part III knowing they were likely to be horrible dreck and irritating?
C) If not, then why comment on films you never saw?
D) If you you did not see all three films, then at what point in the film(s) you did see did you realize that it (they) was (were) horroble dreck and irritating?
E) If you realized that, let's say, based on your superior movie watching skills, that it (they) was (were) horrible dreck within 10 minutes, why would you continue to subject yourself to horrible dreck for more than another 2 1/2 hours, plus sequels, particularly when there are so many Masterpiece Theaters to be watched.
;^)BTW, I don't require a Russian interpretor to explain the ins and outs of over-the-top ramblings from Frenchman living in Germany. Multi-culturalism only goes so far, dude. :o)
Patrick will.For the mind weak. But I wonder that you could not translate it.
Oh yes of course!
Apparently you're taking cleverness classes; good for you! But FYI, de only bile I see on this forum are posts contributed by you and Victor pushing Grey Poupon Euro-films like crack cocaine while dissing popular films and their viewers without just cause.
A rude debile.
;^)
Sorry... That message number is not valid.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: