Films/DVD Asylum

Re: I could have bet....

217.86.2.93

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

patrickU

(A)

In Reply to: You mean " heavy " like a Victrola needle on a broken record repeating the word 'kaka' ad infinitum? posted by Audiophilander on November 18, 2004 at 06:11:17:

And I new you would not missed it! Kaka....Hein? You are so predictible!
But in a way you are fascinating the way you turn things around.
And the pervers way you tend to isolate people is Faschistoid.
Every one is entitle to have fun with debile films.
You too.
Particulary you.

Follow Ups:

Huh? "...have fun with debile films." ...??? - Audiophilander 06:59:12 11/18/04 (7)
Something must be lost in translation. My Webster's New World Broken-English Dictionary has no listing for "debile." At first, I thought maybe this is a pun, but naw, that requires cleverness. So, patrick, would you care to elaborate?
AuPh
- Nothing got lost besides your long lost sensa humah - Victor Khomenko 10:53:02 11/18/04 (2)
  You can always ask me, I'll help you... even if you don't deserve it.
  Yes, LOTR is a horrible dreck. It was irritating in the extreme. But you may keep polishing that turd.
  - Re: Nothing got lost besides your long lost sensa humah - jamesgarvin 12:20:25 11/18/04 (0)
    Victor, questions which beg to be asked:
    (1) Which LOTR was "horrible dreck and irritating?"
    A) If Part I was horrible dreck, then was Part II and III horrible dreck and irritating?
    B) If so, then why would you watch Part II and Part III knowing they were likely to be horrible dreck and irritating?
    C) If not, then why comment on films you never saw?
    D) If you you did not see all three films, then at what point in the film(s) you did see did you realize that it (they) was (were) horroble dreck and irritating?
    E) If you realized that, let's say, based on your superior movie watching skills, that it (they) was (were) horrible dreck within 10 minutes, why would you continue to subject yourself to horrible dreck for more than another 2 1/2 hours, plus sequels, particularly when there are so many Masterpiece Theaters to be watched.
  - I'll leave the "turd polishing" to you and patrick, if you don't mind, and that precludes further abuse of LoTR. - Audiophilander 11:48:54 11/18/04 (0)
    ;^)
    BTW, I don't require a Russian interpretor to explain the ins and outs of over-the-top ramblings from Frenchman living in Germany. Multi-culturalism only goes so far, dude. :o)
    AuPh
- Re: Huh? "...have fun with debile films." ...??? - patrickU 07:11:16 11/18/04 (3)
  Patrick will.
  For the mind weak. But I wonder that you could not translate it.
  Oh yes of course!
  - Ah, yes; so it was a pun; it was your attempt at a Bronx accent that threw me. - Audiophilander 07:35:17 11/18/04 (2)
    Apparently you're taking cleverness classes; good for you! But FYI, de only bile I see on this forum are posts contributed by you and Victor pushing Grey Poupon Euro-films like crack cocaine while dissing popular films and their viewers without just cause.
    AuPh
    - What is worse than a debile? - Victor Khomenko 10:54:27 11/18/04 (1)
      A rude debile.
      - "What is worse than a debile?" Ummm, two armchair Roper/Eberts whose wrong-headed criticisms spread de bile? (nt) - Audiophilander 11:58:46 11/18/04 (0)
        
        In Reply to: What is worse than a debile? posted by Victor Khomenko on November 18, 2004 at 10:54:27:
        
        ;^)

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

You can not post to an archived thread.