|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
81.202.54.142
In Reply to: Accepted. Just one hint: posted by clarkjohnsen on December 29, 2004 at 10:35:25:
...I still find it confusing, not just to a foreigner: in it you simply dismiss the comment made earlier by Ian, laugh out loudly (probably, in a most pleasant bass...), and then mention two of his films. Now, trying to be honest, please read it again, and tell me how, without any previous references in that thread about your liking or disliking of those two films, or of Clint Eastwood´s directorial abilities, how can a reader know, just from reading your post, infer, much less deduct, that you are being ironic, or sarcastic..., instead of simply dismissing him because you value those films as poor ones, as PdL did, just a couple of thread lines down...And now, looking at the whole thread, I see that it was not just me: Ian read your post like I did, and your response to Ian, the same you have included in your answer to my post, in which you try to ridicule my ability to understand the subtleties of the English language (what a pompous ass you are, clark...), was posted by you much later than my post..., and you have the gall to include it as proof of my nonunderstanding!
It is you who doesn´t write clearly, clark.
clark, you are not just ridicule: you are deeply, cowardly dishonest, beyond the usual standard in ultraright wingers. And your omphalocentric attitude is pitiable.
And I can´t remember having specifically included you in the group of mental midgets, but sure you know better than I...
All this said, I see no reason to apologize to you.
Regards
Follow Ups:
...since you choose, even after reflection, to continue your in-my-face rudeness, there are two things I must say. No, three.-- Your untoward pride makes you immune to nuance in English. Read Tosh again: "Let's see what you can direct that is better than even Police Academy and we'll talk..." There's a smile in that, the sort of humor your insulting posts totally lack.
-- And because of #3 below, I can now say that you behave like an arrogant little jerk whose odious pronouncements on almost everything and everyone American -- OK, not even American -- well deserve placement on the shitpile where most of us toss them anyway.
-- You will have no further commerce with me on this or any other forum. Any comment by you will go unread, so you may unleash your full rotten vocabulary-dogs without fear of reprisal, you sniveling piecea'...
clark
***clark, you are not just ridicule: you are deeply, cowardly dishonest, beyond the usual standard in ultraright wingers.You forgot that his feet stink and he snors.
And your interpretation of clark's political views is related to the film discussions exactly how?
Unmanly.
Vic,Even though I strongly disagree with Clark on Eastwood, there is some merit to trashing some of his really bad films prior to Million Dollar Baby.
Every director makes a few stinkers, as you pointed out with Lubitsch. He was still a great director, but moviemaking is a learning experience.
Eastwood, however, has made a GREAT film with Million Dollar Baby. There is real substance here. The characters are not two-dimensional cut-outs whose actions easily fade into memory.
Wes Anderson is the exact opposite of Eastwood. The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou could have caught fire in the projector and it would have been merciful. I turned to my uncle about forty minutes into the film and asked for a cyanide capsule.
Show this film to the Iraqi terrorist thugs and they'll surrender willingly.
Tosh
"I think this place is restricted Wang, so don't tell them you're Jewish"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: