|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Ah, but... posted by Victor Khomenko on July 10, 2000 at 07:55:37:
...but the average American doesnt subscribe to many (if any) of those premium movie services. DSS penetration isnt that great in the bigger shceme of things. Most still soldier on with cable and maybe one or two movie channels at most due to the high monthly cost. And from what I've seen those folks with kids are more concerned about getting the Disney channel than those services anyway. I've also noticed among those folks with dishes I know, they are pretty scrupulous in controlling what their children watch on it....joe
Is there a technical (or economic) reason as to why cable is bundled? I would be much more likely to actually subscribe to cable if I could pick the channels (and only the channels) that I want to watch. That way, I wouldn't have to pay for crap like skinimax 1,2,3,etc just to be able to get one or two of the more obscure channels (like MTV-2, the MTV channel that actually shows videos).
The Cinemax Movie Channel, HBO and other "premium" (jeez, what award for a sewer pipe!) channels are not bundled into the basic service that you need to get in order to see the MTV whatever. I think you can selectively subscribe to paid channels - check your local provider. There is no technical reason why you should not be able - they can turn your access to any paid channel on and off from their office.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: