|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
4.235.203.88
In Reply to: Disagree... posted by mkuller on May 15, 2005 at 17:45:25:
was poorly done.
But, I'm no Anderson fan...
Follow Ups:
...hated "Lost in Translation", too.
I have seen L in T three times and am looking forward to the next. These films, you must realize, have zero in common.
(nt)
> But, I'm no Anderson fan...This would have been useful information in the original review. I know a lot of people who really like his work, and some who hate it. It's really a unique style, or at least emalgam, of directing, and not to everyone's taste.
/*Music is subjective. Sound is not.*/
efforts and favor the newest. I gave valid reasons for my dislike.
1) Angelica Houston looking like cadaver, and
2) Bill Murray breezing through his lines?
They are two of the main actors so if they suck...Now, if Angelica was trying to look funny, ok. But her appearance had NO sense of irony, but:
Neither did the movie and that's enough of a specific reason to discount it, for me.
But, go ahead and buy it. Sometimes a work is so outrageously bad that one searches for reasons to prove it. Hey, you probably love Ishtar.
For an example of the worst movie ever made, Ishtar is old and busted.New hotness: Manos, Hands of Fate.
And I have the proof , too. C'mon, Ishtar isn't even on that list.
/*Music is subjective. Sound is not.*/
You know...I caught it in the theatres when it was being universally panned. It really wasn't half as bad as people made it out to be. Sorta like Roeper calling 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' one of the worst movies of all time. C'mon, I mean has he even seen 'Eegah'?
Tannenbaums is a great example--it's like two movies.
is harder than he might think. His films are thin gruel.
to lose about 100 minutes.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: