|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.61.216.229
I finished watching this film starring Nicole Kidman as a widow about to marry another man after ten years of grieving for her deceased husband. The opening scene shows a man dying contemporaneously with a baby being born.As she is celebrating with family, including Lauren Bacall as her mother, and a little boy shows up and says that he is her deceased husband. Ironically, he has the same birth name as Kidman's deceased hubby. The second act of the film is about her, and her family's dealing with this child who knows many of her secrets, things that only a husband should know.
Kidman, convinced, to the dismay of her fiancee and family, that this is her husband re-incarnated, tries to figure a way that they can be together. She figures that when he is twenty-one, they can begin their lives together. Her fiancee, or course, has a melt down. And Bacall threatens to call the boys mother, who will undoubtedly call the police. The boys mother informs them that her child woke up one morning and stated that he was not her child.
What finally occurs cannot be divulged. Suffice it to say that the key to the film occurs early when the sister-in-law of the deceased hubby, played by Anne Heche, buries something.
I admired that this subject was handled intelligently, and without comic effect. We have seen a litany of inner body experiences that range from cute and entertaining, but ultimately unfilling, to stupid and ridiculous. This film treats the subject seriously, and the characters are given a screenplay which handles the material intelligently, and they speak and act as we imagine a real person would, under those circumstances. The ending is somewhat unexpected, and perfectly logical. Though it may leave some feeling let down.
Kidman is perfect in this role. She has one scene at an opera where the camera focuses on her face, and only on her face, for about three minutes. You can see these events running through her mind, considering what has happened, why it has happened, and what she must do, and what she can do. Brilliant acting. No unnecessary hand gestures, no fake tears, grimaces. Just true acting. That scene confirms my belief that Kidman has the best and most convincing eyes in the business.
The kid was born to play this role. I recently saw him in Godsend, a thouroughly disposable film, and thought that he was destined to play a better role. Here it is. Lauren Bacall is perfectly cast as the steely, logical, grounded mother. Anne Heche is almost unrecognizable in a rather small role. She let her hair grow out, lost the bleach, and lost that flighy, ditzy demeanor. Peter Stormare turns in a good, small, supporting role as Kidman's brother-in-law.
Highly recommended for those who like intelligence in their films, and those that like Kidman, because she is in virtually every scene. Not for those that need excitement, smashes, lots of dialog, or those that cannot cope with a more contemplative film.
Follow Ups:
The music is the opening of Wagner's "Die Walkure".
*
----------
This space available.
...warning - spoiler.I found it totally unbelievable she would leave her adult fiancee for this 10 year old kid, even if he was her reincarnated dead husband. And the bathtub scene was...very creepy. The ending was totally unsatisfying. Big waste of Kidman's talent.
I agree that the film would not to everyone's taste. But would you not agree that an actor can do a very good job in a film that you may not like? Kidman sold me on the plot, and her actions, which is all I can ask an actor to do.Would Kidman leave her adult fiancee for the kid? I do not think she ever intended to do so. She was not leaving him for the kid, but for the person she thought was "inside" the kid, for lack of a better explanation. Consider two scenes: the first, when her fiancee is toasting their engagement, and informs the guests how difficult it was for him to get a date with her, and then, to get her to agree to marry him. Why? Clearly, she was, and is, still in love with her deceased husband, and has difficuly letting go of him. The second scene, which further explains that point, is at the end, after the wedding, when she is in the ocean in her wedding dress. The answer has been provided to her. What reason would she have for her depressed, distant attitude at her wedding? She realizes that she is still in love with deceased husband, to the point that she obviously cannot move on to another man. Whether Kidman's character would act that way? I see and hear humans doing something everyday that I do not expect, and do not understand how they could do. Kidman falling in love with the thought that her husband is still alive in another body does not really surprise me.
The ending was unsatisfying, but perfectly logical. As the film was progressing, I kept wondering how they were going to get out of this. I think that there is no ending which could be satisfactory, given the inherent limitations of the plot. The alternative is to have to magic resolution, a la "Big." But then, that would have not been logical. I thought the ending was as good as they could do, given the plot.
By sheer coincidence I picked this up this morning used at Blockbuster and have been looking forward all day to watching it. Your excellent write-up has only heightened my sense of anticipation.
*
----------
This space available.
I liked it very much and will view it again to pick up anything I missed.
Got me a keeper copy and made more "discoveries" during the first three viewings than in most films. Kidman never looked better. Bacall was superb. Danny Huston had just the right look for a guy who's not accustomed to competition or losing. And, Arliss is one of my B-movie faves. Heche is always good but dowdied up a bit for her role--didn't understand that.The dark lighting and outstanding soundtrack made this a very moody experience. Also, I thought that Kidman's act of contrition was waaay over the top. I'm sure most women will think so.
Too bad the critics killed this one. It has a lot of merit.
----------
This space available.
When the woman(Heche) went to the park to bury the "gift", the kid was following her. I didn't even notice at first.My wife has a way of figuring out movies way too quickly.
She called THE VILLAGE ending just a few minutes in too. Although that one was pretty obvious.
I noticed that scene in my viewing. But the connection did not occur to me until the secret was revealed. Rather not say more untl Rico watches the film.
early on at some point my wife said; "whatever she buried, the kid dug up and was able to..." i asked "how do you know that?" she says "he was following her into the park"
i hadn't even noticed!!she was absolutley dead on.
for the record I really enjoyed the movie too.
my wife over-analyzes everything in movies. i think its the english teacher in her.
i just kind of take the whole movie in and then think about it at the end. watching with her can be tough sometimes
There is still a couple of things that are unanswered. Most obvious: the woman who told her there was no Santa Claus.In the beginning, we never saw the boy watching--he was just gone at the same time.
----------
This space available.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: