|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Life/screen connection posted by Victor Khomenko on August 17, 1999 at 08:30:45:
what's wrong with Clint's personal life? Is there anything else besides Sandra Locke? Because if that's it, unfortunately, you won't find anybody in Hollywood to root for.At least he's not one of typical Hollywood lefties like Demi Moore / Rosie O'Donnell out to make the nation into a fascist regime & won't settle for anything less than a complete revoking of the "Bill of Rights" & PC straight-jacket on behavior.
***what's wrong with Clint's personal life? Is there anything else besides Sandra Locke? Because if that's it, unfortunately, you won't find anybody in Hollywood to root for.Not much there at all, as I said before I have a lot of respect for him. We all work with the information we have and according to mine he could have been a bit more "manly". This may be skewed information, for sure.
***At least he's not one of typical Hollywood lefties like Demi Moore / Rosie O'Donnell out to make the nation into a fascist regime & won't settle for anything less than a complete revoking of the "Bill of Rights" & PC straight-jacket on behavior.
5000% agreement here. I could add many more names to that list, heck, I'd rather concentrate on the list of politically smart Hollywood personalities, it is hundreds of times shorter. I don't think anybody had analyzed the Hollywood psyche better than Rush. I see little need to repent it here.
... but haven't a clue about Rush 's philosophy.He's a tad too G.O.P. for me. I'm more of a conservative.
e.g.: There's is no surplus! But since it's convoluted non-existence is perceived as fact, it's best to have a tax-cut because the D.N.C. will further expand the debt much further & ensure the demise of S.S. & medicare radically sooner by its further expansion & growing entitlements. This isn't even debatable. The Dem's freely admit it, iff ( if & only if ) you listen closely enough. However, while I agree about the Rep's increasing deductions & removing the marriage penalty provisions ( even though I'm single w/ no dependents ), the G.O.P. want an across the board income tax cut. Hello?! This isn't where the illedged surplus resides. It's in the comparitively regressive withheld wage tax & that's where the across-the-board should take place ( even though I'd probably receive slightly more by the former plan ). That would be one bill fairly pork-free.
Also, since the G.O.P. has the reputation as cutting malious programs, such as the ...
... sanctimonious Department of non-Education that insists on promoting mis-information instead of teaching children history, literature, math, science, etc.
... elitist Nation Endowment of the Autistic that also enjoys routing money from schools in order to fund people with Tourette's Syndrome.Just do it! Bypass the entire bearocracy & reroute all funds directly to the schools.
But yes, you are right.***... but haven't a clue about Rush's philosophy.
He's a tad too G.O.P. for me. I'm more of a conservative.I am not a big scholar of his, but it seems that he is constantly on the GOP's tail for not being more "true conservative" and for not standing for their beliefs - for following the polls to closely. Heck, for paying attention to polls at all! I usually completely agree with his "die by your beliefs" philosoply.
***Just do it! Bypass the entire bearocracy & reroute all funds directly to the schools.
I am always in favor of giving directly. Does that mean we should start paying directly to Clint and Jack and yes, even to Leonardo, and completely bypass Stephen and Lucas?
... funding/imagination/inspiration/perspiration/clout/etc? By all means, YES! ... Absolutely!!! ... w/o a solitary doubt.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: