|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: *RE: Thin red line* posted by Emit on August 01, 2000 at 05:21:59:
I understand your points, but I still disagree and maintain my argument. TRL hits you over the head repeatedly with it's transparent symbolism. I was insulted, frankly. Malick is such a pretentious filmmaker, it makes me sick. He's made three films too many.I never said TRL was just about nature v. machines. Like you said, in the first scene, you have war v. peace, man v. nature, peace v. death, beauty v. horror, etc. but nature v. machines is also a part of this. Regarding the intelligence of Wit, you're on very shakey ground here. It's obvious that this character dropped out of school at a very early age to work on the farm. Listen to his speech (not his accent), and notice the way he behaves in the presence of his superiors. This is not an intelligent character. If Malick wanted him to be, he did a poor job.
I appreciate your thoughts, but this film is very hollow.
Follow Ups:
> Listen to his speech (not his accent), and notice the way he behaves
> in the presence of his superiors. This is not an intelligent character.Care to elaborate? I know quite a few "Wits" in real life, who are impulsive, uneducated, and unafraid of punishment. But to imply that they aren't capable of subtle, articulated thought is absurd. In my experience quite a few poets, musicians, and other artists fall into this realm.
-Chris
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: