Films/DVD Asylum

• I find the Trilogy very moving. What do you think of The Decalogue? -nt- - Donald 02:48:18 07/21/05 (1)
  In Reply to: Re: What are your top ten favourite all time directors------- posted by patrickU on July 21, 2005 at 00:59:27:

  .
  
  

  ---

  • Re: I find the Trilogy very moving. What do you think of The Decalogue? -nt- - patrickU 09:44:59 07/21/05 (0)
    In Reply to: I find the Trilogy very moving. What do you think of The Decalogue? -nt- posted by Donald on July 21, 2005 at 02:48:18:

    Sorry I can not say, as I saw only a part of them and too long ago.
    
    

    ---
• Bravo!!! Calling a spade a spade... Kieslowski´s rhetoric is nothing but emptiness wrapped up ... - orejones 01:44:52 07/21/05 (6)
  In Reply to: Re: What are your top ten favourite all time directors------- posted by patrickU on July 21, 2005 at 00:59:27:

  ...in a flashy envelope, which is worth much more than the hot air it contains...

  Regards

  BF
  
  

  ---

  • Rhetoric? Please clarify. -nt- - Donald 05:47:02 07/21/05 (5)
    In Reply to: Bravo!!! Calling a spade a spade... Kieslowski´s rhetoric is nothing but emptiness wrapped up ... posted by orejones on July 21, 2005 at 01:44:52:

    .
    
    

    ---

    • Re: Rhetoric? Please clarify. -nt- - patrickU 09:49:04 07/21/05 (0)
      In Reply to: Rhetoric? Please clarify. -nt- posted by Donald on July 21, 2005 at 05:47:02:

      I think that Bernardo told it the best possible way! I mean our view on this trilogy!
      A film that is all form without contend.
      Empty.
      But I must say that the first one did at first attrct me too. I soon realised my mistake, after the second and third part.
      So empty as the music in part one.
      
      
      

      ---
    • Grandiloquence without actual content... (nt) - orejones 07:59:43 07/21/05 (3)
      In Reply to: Rhetoric? Please clarify. -nt- posted by Donald on July 21, 2005 at 05:47:02:

      
      
      

      ---

      • Re: Grandiloquence without actual content... (nt) - Donald 18:26:25 07/21/05 (2)
        In Reply to: Grandiloquence without actual content... (nt) posted by orejones on July 21, 2005 at 07:59:43:

        The trilogy is overflowing with content, though the style is perhaps strong enough to obscure it for the unobservant.
        
        

        ---

        • Re: Grandiloquence without actual content... (nt) - patrickU 03:32:24 07/22/05 (0)
          In Reply to: Re: Grandiloquence without actual content... (nt) posted by Donald on July 21, 2005 at 18:26:25:

          He-he a nice vice-versa....
          
          

          ---
        • Sure. (nt) - orejones 02:01:57 07/22/05 (0)
          In Reply to: Re: Grandiloquence without actual content... (nt) posted by Donald on July 21, 2005 at 18:26:25:

          
          
          

          ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

The Cable Cooker

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---