Films/DVD Asylum

Posted by Victor Khomenko (i) on August 07, 2000 at 09:06:17:

In Reply to: Victor; Dmitry posted by Bruce from DC on August 07, 2000 at 08:12:28:

***Unwittingly, I have started this long thread.

Yes, and your punishment will be watching Judgement At Nuremberg fifty times...

***Responding to a couple of points.

***First, the fact that the Germans' motivation or purpose for WWII was especially evil is, in my view, not useful in judging their military units' conduct. I do not think it would be ok for American sub crews to shoot Japanese survivors in lifeboats just because the Americans were fighting for "truth, justice and the American Way."

I don't think anyone was suggesting that. There are, however, 'just' and 'unjust' wars. Funny part is that the same war can be both. What had started as a very unjust one when Stalin took Poland, eventually turned into a 'just' war, only to become questionable again towards its end.

But you are right in essence - no amount of 'just' allows for any atrocities to be commited. And I think the US had shown many times that it indeed takes such issues quite seriously. Most armies do have some dark spots on their histories, though.

***Conversely, I don't think it is evil for U-Boat crews to concentrate their efforts on North Atlantic shipping lanes to sink ships supplying Great Britain or the USSR because the Nazis were fighting for world domination. At the general staff level, where such plans were formulated and carried out, yes there should be responsibility for pursuing an unjust cause. But at the operational unit level, no I don't see culpability for the cause that these units served.

Well, we obvioulsy differ on this account. You would be right if not for the general atmosphere of support and enthusiasm in Germany before and during the early stages of war. Remember, most Germans were to benefit from that 'plentiful slave labor'. Rome revisited...

***Incidental violence against civilians is a tough yardstick to use. Both sides get caught up in that net. Yes, the German air campaign, especially the use of "guided" missles against Britain was nothing but a terror campaign. But what was the military justification for the allied firebombing of Dresden -- that Germans lived there? Same question for the firebombing of Tokyo and other Japanese cities? The use of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki? Yes, the U-Boats torpedoed or shot every allied vessel they could find in the North Atlantic. But the US waged a comparable -- and ultimately more successful -- submarine war against Japan with similar tactics.

It is always helpful to look at who the agressor is in every conflict. I would not hesitate to state that the agressor does surrender a lot of his rights as result of his actions - much like a criminal does. Pretty much all responsibility for loss of lives, both in the army and cvilians, falls on him. The prime responsibility of the government fighting the agressor is in preserving the lives of ITS own citizens.

That is related also to the question of treating the POW's at a time when your own citizens die every day of starvation and lack of medical help - how many resources should be takes away from the innocent victims in order to support the lives of the agressor's soldiers. My mother-in-law's family was evacuated during the war to Tashkent. There both parents died of hunger, and two young girls had to struggle to stay alive after burring them. In that case I am sorry, but I do not feel that the bread and medicine, that were so sorely scarce, should have been diverted to the German soldiers captured at Stalingrad. For all I care, they should have been put in the besieged Leningrad to die slow agonizing deaths alongside with about one million of its citizens who perished during the 900 days of that blocade.

***Third, I do not see the U-Boats -- or any other military units -- as "samurai" fighting the "honorable fight" etc. In fact, I have serious doubts that the samurai themselves were the "honorable warriors" that they have become in legend and literature. Obviously, it serves the purposes of those who tell their stories to make them so.

It is quite funny that you brought up the subject of 'samurai'. Just recently I stumbled over this page:

http://www.links2go.com/more/www.cnd.org/njmassacre/njm-tran/

...and it chilled my blood. It is about the 'honorable samurai' behavior, and includes the storis on massacres and on dissecting of the American POW's.

When I look at the frightening photos of Japanese officers leaning on their bloodied swords smiling and holding chopped-off humand heads proudly displayed - I know I shall never be collecting those 'honorable samurai' swords.

Sorry for the rant, but certain things do touch me deeply. I do not find anything in your posts offensive, BTW, just stimulating discussion.