Films/DVD Asylum

Re: Transporter 2...

209.51.206.24

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

TAFKA Steve

(A)

In Reply to: Transporter 2... posted by mkuller on September 5, 2005 at 16:25:51:

I don't understand why he refuses to start a relationship with the client's wife (separated) in this one because of his dangerous profession, while he had no problems getting involved romantically with the daughter of his nemesis in the first Transporter. Oh, that's right, I need to suspend my belief. And the boy needs his father.
If you think this action is outrageous, see "Ong Bak." No wires, no air springs, no CGI, just incredible athleticism and stunt people with the highest pain tolerances.

Follow Ups:

Re: Transporter 2... - PhilNYC 14:22:32 09/07/05 (0)
Maybe he learned his lesson about getting involved after doing so in the first one...
If that's the biggest question... - mkuller 09:50:47 09/07/05 (0)
...you have after watching this movie - you weren't paying attention!
Ong Bak - Jack G 04:58:06 09/06/05 (0)
That was an interesting movie. A bit slow in the beginning.
As you said, no wires, no CGI, and no stunt doubles. Not much of a plot, but killer fight scenes.
Jack
Maybe the "Transporter" doesn't routinely commit adultery . . . - mr grits 18:59:55 09/05/05 (3)
Seperated does not mean divorced, remember? It was fun watching an action hero with a near cockney accent, though.
- Maybe he's gay. - TAFKA Steve 05:53:17 09/06/05 (2)
  Impeccable wardrobe and car, has a French male friend in his house that cooks for him,...hmmm. "Metrosexual," at the least.
  - Er . . . YOU go ask him. * - mr grits 15:22:57 09/06/05 (0)
    .
  - Remember his character in Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels? nt - tinear 06:54:43 09/06/05 (0)
    s

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

The Cable Cooker

You can not post to an archived thread.