|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.57.37.236
In Reply to: What work qualifies as the most *aesthetic* film? posted by Guy on December 6, 2005 at 22:01:21:
is a film that stands out as an epic of beauty, a flim that takes 17th century painting and animates it, where every shot could almost be hung in an art museum.
Follow Ups:
(nt)
I guess you're right about O'Neill. But there's something about this ineptitude and fakery that make him compelling in the role in an odd sort of way. You have to wonder if Kubrick wasn't exploiting O'Neill's shallowness in some way.Marissa Berenson was certainly not going to win any Oscars either.
Kubrick, as you guys know, was notoriously fussy with his actors, often insisting on take, after take, after take to get the exact thing he was looking for.
Nichelson once quipped "Just because you're a perfectionist, Stanley, doesn't mean you're perfect."
.
...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: