Films/DVD Asylum

Re: REVIEW: paraphrased Narnia review posted on Steve Hoffman's board...

84.169.253.53

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

patrickU

(A)

In Reply to: REVIEW: paraphrased Narnia review posted on Steve Hoffman's board... posted by Audiophilander on December 12, 2005 at 13:47:11:

To compare the " Ring " to " LoTR " is to give this trilogy a legitimation that it just do not deserve.
Doing that won�t help you, it will go in the next generations as the " big kaka " of the century.
Loud and empty.
As for the benchmark " Potter ", Ah-ha!
Narnia must be a good film!

Follow Ups:

Narnia is perfect for you & Victor, especially since "loud and empty" is your forte; hey, it has talking beavers! - Audiophilander 10:11:07 12/13/05 (0)
> > > 'To compare the " Ring " to " LoTR " is to give this trilogy a legitimation that it just do not deserve.' < < <
The " Ring " ...? I have no idea what you're driving at here; I made no such comparison. You really need to apply some superglue on your broken english; when the only folks to whom it makes sense without subtitles are Victor and Clark you're playing to a very small house indeed! ;^)
AuPh
"As for the benchmark 'Potter', Ah-ha!" My thought precisely. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:08:12 12/13/05 (11)
a
- Hey Clark, if you're going to quote me, at least try to do it in context! - Audiophilander 11:08:28 12/13/05 (10)
  It was "...and the epic or timeless fantasy of Lord of The Rings trilogy." - Reread my post.
  These ARE benchmarks of the film fantasy and contemporary fantasy literature; LoTR is more traditional epic fantasy with universal themes in a well told tale while Harry Potter is grounded in the real "muggle" (mundane) world and linked to an alternative fantasy universe.
  Of course you have the right to differ if your opinions are informed by anything, but at least base your criticisms on something besides "Me too!"
  AuPh
  - Uh... I was quoting patrick, not U. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:48:02 12/13/05 (9)
    a
    - Oh, I get it. - Audiophilander 11:55:33 12/13/05 (8)
      ;^)
      - Re: You are a kind of... - patrickU 13:39:13 12/13/05 (7)
        
        In Reply to: Oh, I get it. posted by Audiophilander on December 13, 2005 at 11:55:33:
        
        A jerk, are you not!
        Ha-ha...
        
        "A jerk, are you not!" - In terms of measured responses to other jerks, perhaps, but not unjustly. - Audiophilander 14:27:03 12/13/05 (6)
        
        In Reply to: Re: You are a kind of... posted by patrickU on December 13, 2005 at 13:39:13:
        
        Those who lay rotten eggs in someone else's nest shouldn't be surprised or upset when their roost gets fouled.
        BTW, that closet of your's is getting filled up over on the Outside board. It's beginning to look like the statesroom scene from A Night at The Opera with you, Victor, Clark's Johnsen, Pathetic to Groundless, and dennzio occupying a phone booth sized closet! Even though it's becoming a Who's Who of the usual wingnut suspects, your Call Box isn't a Tardis, so the mental image isn't very pretty! ;^D
        AuPh
        
        Re: OK. A closet jerk-----------nt------ - patrickU 04:15:15 12/14/05 (1)
        
        In Reply to: "A jerk, are you not!" - In terms of measured responses to other jerks, perhaps, but not unjustly. posted by Audiophilander on December 13, 2005 at 14:27:03:
        
        nt
        
        Well, I would never refer to YOU as a "closet" jerk. (nt) - Audiophilander 10:34:51 12/14/05 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Re: OK. A closet jerk-----------nt------ posted by patrickU on December 14, 2005 at 04:15:15:
        
        ;^)
        
        Well, all that maybe so, but at least none of us... - Victor Khomenko 15:13:07 12/13/05 (3)
        
        In Reply to: "A jerk, are you not!" - In terms of measured responses to other jerks, perhaps, but not unjustly. posted by Audiophilander on December 13, 2005 at 14:27:03:
        
        ...looks like he just left his trailer park on his way to buy some more Bud, between the first and second parts of LOTR.
        All you need to do is dress smartly, take a bath and watch a couple of good movies, then you will have your chance too.
        Well... you would also have to watch your dirty tongue!
        
        "...at least none of us looks like he just left his trailer park on his way to buy some more Bud... " - Audiophilander 15:42:32 12/13/05 (2)
        
        In Reply to: Well, all that maybe so, but at least none of us... posted by Victor Khomenko on December 13, 2005 at 15:13:07:
        
        > > > "... between the first and second parts of LOTR." < < <
        How is that misimpression different than the one of folks who try to look like faux Napoleons caught up in a more modern battle of the bulge, with their supply lines overextended after too much War and Pizza! ;^)
        > > > "Well... you would also have to watch your dirty tongue!" < < <
        My tongue probably isn't as long as your's & Gene Simmons, so I can't really watch it, but I'll wager that it's a heck of a lot cleaner when you start counting up "kaka" usage. ;^D
        AuPh
        
        Re: I don't know, AuPh. Haven't seen a Kaka Charge in quite a while * - Guy 00:01:42 12/15/05 (1)
        
        In Reply to: "...at least none of us looks like he just left his trailer park on his way to buy some more Bud... " posted by Audiophilander on December 13, 2005 at 15:42:32:
        
        ...
        
        My language is definitely cleaner than Victor's; do an archive search of offensive words if you don't believe me. - Audiophilander 14:55:04 12/15/05 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Re: I don't know, AuPh. Haven't seen a Kaka Charge in quite a while * posted by Guy on December 15, 2005 at 00:01:42:
        
        Ol' Vic could probably make a sailor blush! ;^)
        AuPh

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Schiit Audio

You can not post to an archived thread.