|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Thanks, (more analysis - long. . . .) posted by Tyson on October 24, 2000 at 07:49:33:
**I, however, thought the 2nd half was just as RIVETING as the 1st
half, just slower paced...**The 2nd half was anti-climatic.
**I also thought it was brilliant to contrast, blah, blah, blah, ...
with the BOREDOM and blah, blah, blah....**Yeah, I also sat RIVETED to the screen watching all that BOREDOM, if you
contrast something interesting with something else, make sure that
something else is interesting also, not just variation of structure
and pace.
Follow Ups:
What would you have considered a good 2nd half to FMJ? If you could, what would you have done differently?
As Director, I would have attempted to orchestrate a set of events
with more dramatic tension to keep viewer interest, culminating in
a relatively strong second climax to provide resolution and a more satisfying sense of closure. - AH
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: