|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.27.187.224
In Reply to: Hmmm- that's right , she said "story", not book... posted by Jim Campilongo on January 10, 2006 at 14:41:28:
I certainly didn't regret the time spent, but as I said before, not for one moment did I believe in their relationship.To this day the portrayal of real sexual feelings between two men who identify as regular-guy masculine has not been done on the big screen or on TV. The short story was far better in that regard. But insofar as the film did somewhat break out of the envelope (in a PC-approved way, of course), it has generated interest.
Follow Ups:
lurks a Goldilocks.Clark, what exactly do you mean by "regular-guy masculine"?
You mean like Marlon Brando in "A Streetcar Named Desire"? Oh wait--that was written by gay guy.
Is possible for two "regular-guy masculine" guys to express "real sexual feelings" for each other and still be "regular-guy masculine," whatever that means?
You do realize that all gender is role playing, a kind of drag? And that, since it is all drag, it is impossible for one role to be more authentic than another?
Or are you just one of those self-hating femme types who still has a crush on the guy who pumped gas at the station on the corner?
Sorry, I know it seems like I have picked on you a lot today, but you keep posting and you keep posting really stupid things.
Jeffery
Now go take that nasty mouse of yours and stuff it up where there ain't no daylight and pleasure yourself to tears.
. . . are beautiful, like a rainbow.
d
screenplay with "real sexual feelings" and then act and direct.
We're waiting...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: