|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.199.64.81
Despite the good acting performances and nice cinematography The Missing , well ... had a lot missing for me.
At first I was surprised by how dark and hardcore this Ron Howard film was. Usually he's so "Opie"...The always fun to look at Kate Blanchett employs her craggily and estranged father Tommy Lee Jones to rescue her kidnapped teenage daughter . Her daughter, and other young virgins (actually a few had babies) are abducted for white slavery prostitution, by the mystical evil incarnate Indian brujo witch.
This pock marked witch travels with his gang of savage, bloodthirsty, giggling, drunk and staggering Indians (and a white guy with real bad teeth!). His trail is littered with victims that are blinded, burned , baked and stabbed while he navigates his brood of young, whimpering woman.
The torture scenes are done by way of brief horrific glances and in more then one case, I saw something I wish I hadn't. In a less graphic little vignette we see the Brujo forcing Kate Blanchett's daughter to eat dirt while saying " ...this is what your life will taste like..."
The entire lead up and story line involving crucifixes, ju-ju, black magic, lucky beads, lucky numbers, good and bad luck and other form of witchcraft applied by both the good and bad guys was dropped like a hot voodoo doll..... Instead we get a Indian shooting gallery Hollywood ending. Well almost ...Tommy Lee's character does attain retribution before the closing credit hailed " DIRECTED BY RON HOWARD"
For me most annoying thing about "The Missing" was the relentless use music. Bad music. I hear this more and more these days- it's this new-age B.S. that offers no real melody... just panpipes with a swelling orchestra that reads a score that basically doodles on the pentatonic scale.
Follow Ups:
At least I did not recommend it too hightly! :-)We were discussing Ron Howard, and I still think the Missing - with all its faults - is an above average film, by our current standards. A Ron Howard discussion puts you in a different mood than, say, one on Antonioni.
I hope you don't let this little flop color your perception of my other posts!
No way Victor - You've earned many points with me!In the context of our exchange I think you mentioned it as simply worth seeing - not a "great" movie. Despite the negative (and funny, I hope) nature of my post, I actually did sit at the edge of my seat a few times while watching that film. Not a complete waste of time at all.
...and more then once I marveled at the fact I was watching a movie referred to me by someone on the other side of the planet ( I think). This internet can be a wonderful thing! Your viewpoints, and the excellent writings of others on this site have given me hours of enjoyment.
Thanks again Victor - for everything! -Jim
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: