Films/DVD Asylum

Re: "...warmed up again..."

84.169.241.45

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

patrickU

(A)

In Reply to: Re: "...warmed up again..." posted by rico on May 11, 2006 at 09:59:14:

Much more in a " Bermannesque " way, but I think the real WA tone is not the Greek tragic but much more suitable to him the ...WA tone.
And you know what? I thought already at it yesterday as I saw it.
There is an immense likeness between this picture and...
So now, here is the question, and what other film?
Guess.

Follow Ups:

Re: "...warmed up again..." - rico 10:44:36 05/11/06 (7)
I haven't a clue. Tell me.
- Re: "...warmed up again..." - patrickU 12:00:21 05/11/06 (6)
  Gosford Park. Altman�s film.
  The same critical view on upper class.
  - But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - Analog Scott 12:32:28 05/11/06 (5)
    nt
    - Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 00:13:29 05/12/06 (2)
      Yes much richer, on different levels particulary on the social issue.
      Ultimatively also a failure, and that did hurt me reaaly hard.
      I think the way S. Fry act and the way Altman let him and the script ruin the second half of the film.
      My big loss.
      Anyway there are many similitudes between both films, don�t you think?
      - Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - Analog Scott 08:15:15 05/13/06 (1)
        
        In Reply to: Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt posted by patrickU on May 12, 2006 at 00:13:29:
        
        There certainly are parrallels in content but the feel of each is so different that I have a hard time calling them similar.
        
        Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 08:46:29 05/13/06 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt posted by Analog Scott on May 13, 2006 at 08:15:15:
        
        I would call them distant cousins.
    - Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - rico 13:05:45 05/11/06 (1)
      Yes, if youcould underststand what the hell they were saying.
      - Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt - patrickU 00:15:44 05/12/06 (0)
        
        In Reply to: Re: But don't you think that was a much richer film? nt posted by rico on May 11, 2006 at 13:05:45:
        
        He-he...I had the CC titles on...And a shot of single malt...( that is very necessary on this one...)

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

VH Audio

You can not post to an archived thread.