|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.163.33.3
In Reply to: I fail to see how this book/film can be considered to be ridiculing christianity... posted by dave c on May 18, 2006 at 20:01:59:
that Jesus married Mary.Maybe widely held among a very small fringe cult of bizzare reprobates but not beyond. Not only is the suggestion repugnant to Christians on its face it is simply counter to the very nature which is revealed of Jesus.These kinds of heresies end up making the Saviour of Mankind out to be some Hippie guru knocking up his gullible disciples.What kind of man,knowing he was going to die before his child would be born,then conceives one leaving the woman a widow with an infant and especially in that society?It is inconceivable first of all that Almighty God would copulate with a human being.That is about the most grotesque image of abuse i can imagine and coming from the loving creator it is simply totally beyond the furthurmost extreme of absurdity.The idea seems to have been formulated by French Monarchists who sought to add some trump to their aims to regain political power so they linked themselves with the Most High God by blood descent with this base farse and corrupt and depraved men make sport and profit from it,wow big suprise there.LOL.
Follow Ups:
s
First, wasn't it god who impregnated the virgin (and apparently 14 years old) Mary?
If Jesus was god, the who was god?
I have never figured how Jesus kind of inherited the god part.
Lastly, why would it be repugnant to christians if Jesus had a sex life, since, if we are made in god's image, the presumably god has a sexual side. It does seem to be a common way of propagating almost every species.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: