|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
208.58.2.83
In Reply to: Clark, show me an article with a similar point of view from a peer-reviewed scientific journal of repute... posted by C.B. on June 16, 2006 at 09:42:15:
In 2003 they published an article by Soon and Baliunas, abstracted in the header below. It says exactly what you don't want it to say.It will be amusing to watch you weasel out of this one, because there the thing is for all to see.
I'll give you my mailing address in private e-mail; a USPS money order preferred.
clark
Follow Ups:
see link-A quote from the article by David Appell: "The Soon et al. paper is so fundamentally misconceived and contains so many egregious errors that it would take weeks to list and explain them all."
Perhaps I should have said "peer reviewed and accepted".
- http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000829C7-70D9-1EF7-A6B8809EC588EEDF&sc=I100322 (Open in New Window)
But not quite. You owe me $100 fair and square.Put your money where your mouth is.
And by the way, thousands of journal articles are challenged every year. So what?
With scientific facts one usually selects the ones that fit his world vision.
s
When it comes right down to it, you are a spectator. You can't play this game any more than you can claim expertise in biology.I have said it many times before. You don't count, neither do I.
even the scientists take a back seat to the work. And the work strengthens the human induced hypothesis.I don't have the expertise to 'peer review' that article. But I find very telling that Soon and Baliunas defined the current warming out of existence. Looks like a cheap stunt, but what do I know.
a
.
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: